Is there other illegal immigrants besides the Mexican?

Question

Sure there is!!! Why pick on them? Easy target? If you look at this way, they are native americans. They lived and still live in Texas, NEW MEXICO (love that name for a State) and all those other states that the UNION stole from them. If they were here first, that makes them a NATIVE AMERICAN.

MEXICANS ARE NATIVE AMERICANS!!!!!!

Answer 1

Yes,
There was such a flood in the old days that they did not really have a group per se. The English were followed by the Irish and Germans who were followed by other groups as the world political turmoil ebbed and flowed.

We sometimes call an Italian by the nickname "WOP" without ever realizing what this meant back then.

"WOP"= With Out Papers, and was the rubber stamp given to someone of ANY nationality as they processed through Parris Island.

I am 1/4 Irish, 1/4 Scot, and 1/2 Mexican (Arapaho).
Born and raised in the USA and served the US military with distinction for 20 years. I remember and cherish where I came from and I am a "Native American" in every sense of the word.

Answer 2

Mexico sold land the the United states. IT SOLD the land it was not stolen! If you have a problem with that well take it up with the Mexican government. However all you do it slant the truths to fit your own believes.

As for New Mexico name believe me there are plenty of British Name that the United States Has all with the NEW in front of it. New Hampshire. There is a Hampshire in England etc.

We aren't we picking on any other illegal. If you bother to read the answer not the the ones you like or that side with your believes you would see that it's all illegals not just the Mexican illegals. Why are the Mexican illegals the prime target. Number one how many other illegal are asking question on here? You yourself target the Mexicans.
How many other illegal are marching on American streets wanting anmesty? Therefore if Mexicans chose not to be in the limelight they might not want to march on American streets screaming WE BROKE YOUR LAWS NOW WANT YOU TO CHANGE THEM FOR US.

Answer 3

Are you hoping we do know how to read. Mexico had nothing but Indians before the spaniards got there. There are still full blooded tribes in Mexico.One of them that I know for sure is the Chiapas indians.Some of the spaniards did mix with the Indians. Most of the Wealthy spanish blood did not.The Indians were and are still consider inferior.Most of the illegal aliens in the USA have brown skin. That means they have Indian blood.The wealthy in Mexico have white skin. The indian tribes were not completely wiped out. According to Texas history most of about 5000 Mexican soldiers at the battle of the Alamo were Mexican Indians.

Answer 4

Actually, they weren't here first.

The Aztecs were here first, the native tribes were here first, the Mayans were here first ( the new world that is ) Mexicans are predominantly of Spanish decent ( hence the word Hispanic ), the Aztecs were wiped out by the Spanish ( Cortez really ) This makes them of European decent just like most Americans. In fact, they are decended from the people who originally stole the land from the natives.

To answer you question however, no one is picking on illegal immigrants. The outcry is to stop illegal immigration. Why?

Because its ILLEGAL that's why. As simple as that. If they want to come into the U.S. legally I say more power to them and welcome aboard, immigrants invigorate our culture and make America better. Illegal immigrants on the other hand are a drain on our society because they cannot contribute in the same fashion as a legal citizen ( ie taxes )

Answer 5

OK this issue is done. the Germans now need someone to whine about Prussia and Alsace-Lorraine for them...

The Mexican-American War and its immediate consequences were, is and forever will be irrelevant to the Issue of Illegal Immigration. The Mexicans lost, big whup. Go whine about something recent please.

And by the way Mexicans again... ARE NOT NATIVE AMERICANS. They are half-breeds of Spanish and natives or are Spanish themselves.

Answer 6

Mexicans are not native Americans the Indians are the natives.

Answer 7

Damn, and I thought all this time it was the Cherokee, Cheyenne, Sioux, and all the rest that were NATIVE AMERICAN hence...American. The Mexicans are native to MEXICO...hence..."Mexican". Hate to bust your Mexican bubble, but the American Indians were here before the Mexicans were.

Answer 8

I look at it THIS way...21st century, facts abound, avail yourself of some of them...6.6 billion in the world, 300 million in america, time for a rethink on tolerating incompetent immigration policy/enforcement. 'They/you stole our land from us' crap is both specious, and irrelevant. Think really really hard about how Mexico and other countries have basically failed to evolve and develop, and you quickly understand how 12 million illegal aliens INCLUDING those from Mexico ended up in the United States.
Also, the majority ARE from Mexico...again, look up the facts on the issue...it's just time for em to evolve, is all, and stop assuming that it's somehow America's moral responsibility to care for their poor...

Answer 9

Native Mexicans are discriminated against in Mexico, or didn't you know that? Treated like second class citizens if you don't have a Spanish name and light skin. It's not a matter of picking on Mexicans you dumbass. Illegals are illegals, I don't care what country they come from.

Answer 10

i'm a Republican who happens to have a liberal view on immigration. in case you go with human beings to tension the fee cut back and not 5 to ten mph over, you're able to implement that on the spot - no longer without notice turn around and retroactively hand out hundreds of tickets and droop each physique's license for what we've all been doing for an extremely long term. it quite is an unwritten settlement that besides the fact that technically unlawful, the law enforcement officers are going to permit you destroy out with going slightly over the fee cut back. we've been lax on imposing unlawful immigration and appeared any opposite direction. it quite is lots greater straightforward to tutor human beings away on the border or deport them as quickly as their visa expires than to throw them in another country while they have been right here for many, some years and geared up a life right here. finally, we could guard the border and to make certain who's right here. in the event that they are no longer criminals, i don't have a undertaking with a pathway to citizenship - and that i've got not any desire to squeeze those human beings like many different conservatives look to experience is needed. so some distance as "leaping the line", the topic there is that there's a line in any respect. Our felony immigration device is so screwed up that it quite is backing up people who could have the potential to pass into and contribute to the country. All of this is in basic terms context... to respond to your question, I nonetheless don't have a undertaking with the term. The "unlawful" in "unlawful immigrant" denotes status - an analogous way we've "unmarried human beings" and "married human beings". that's a factually precise ongoing status. The term has no longer something to do with race or racism. There are white unlawful immigrants too. How is the framing incorrect? in basic terms because of the fact i'm no longer vast on punishment for a criminal offense we weren't properly imposing does no longer mean they are no longer finally to blame and to blame for his or her own strikes. so some distance as employers, in the previous many have not universal (or quite frankly tried to no longer be responsive to) whether their workers have been unlawful or no longer. For those you may tutor knowingly employed "unlawful immigrants", I have not any situation calling them "unlawful employers" the two. pass forward and upload that to the lexicon.