Many of those countries seem desperate to get nuclear technology...we have a lot of it....lets just give it to them.
2006-12-01 18:29:17 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
That would not solve the long-term problem. Every time America falters or backs down, the recruitment for the radical Islamic cause goes through the roof. To use nukes would turn the tide of world opinion even further away from us than it is. Sadly, it seems to me that nobody wants to take this threat seriously except us.We need to just slug it out with them, to show we have the guts to not back down from a fight. This, they will understand.
2006-12-01 18:34:50 · answer #1 · answered by Rich B 5 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Please don't be a dumb ***... Or ignorant dumb ***.. Or even a war-monger who all he does is wanting to kill..
First of all, all men are created EQUAL, it's in our constitution, I don't know about women but some people in Iraq or Iran are completely innocent, 6 year old kids, and pregnant mothers.. Fathers who work 18 hours just to put food on their table while being terrorized by terrorist groups... I don't think these people deserve to die, you can NEVER destroy an enemy, if you kill your enemy, his son will become your enemy, his friends will become your enemy.. I obey the Constitution and my own morals and principles and I don't think innocent Iraqis or middle eastern people are any less or more then US citizens... (Americans basically means Canadians and Mexicans, why did we name our selves after a continent?)...
Nuclear weapons also hurt the WORLD, which includes US. The winds would probably sweep the radiations and all the nasties into the Americas, Asia, Europe, Africa.. I think the US has made a lot of mistakes in the past with weapons of mass destruction or harm.. Agent Orange.. Etc etc And this would totally destroy US's reputation in the world, and our own health.. We're better going into middle east and killing those terrorist our selves then dropping a bomb which could destroy the Earth and 99.9% pollute it.. The middle east is big my friend, and something that big can't be nuked without big sacrifices...
Those countries want nuclear technology, we have a lot of it... Well I don't agree we give anything that's considered nuclear to them, unless the terrorism coming from the middle east stopped, North Korea too, but they aren't as big of a treat even with nukes since they're too afraid to act on their words... All they do is provoke like my friend doodles on my homework, but he never rips it or scribble big mess on it.. When the world unites, we can form more of a peaceful world and every country can have nuclear technology...
However I do agree they should have nuclear power plants, just not missiles.. Wtf is with Nuclear missiles now days? I like the good old M16s then having my own clothes being tanned unto my skin and being vaporized and watching my family being vaporized. Kind of sad how far the need for power can get too, I rarely hear European countries developing nuclear weapons etc.. Maybe it's just the media not saying anything about it tho... (I don't watch Fox or ABC very often, but the Ex Russian Spy death by radioactive element questions me...)..
Well good luck to the world and to you.. Hope you understand the consequences of nuclear weapons, it's not pretty.. Let's just stick to environmentally safe bullets and artillery rounds that are lethal yet forgiving to the land we live, feed, and grow on...
Hopefully as the future grows, my children won't ever have to face war on Earth's soil, some where else maybe.. But I like this planet.
2006-12-01 18:48:55 · answer #2 · answered by Shadowfox 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Over thousands of years and translations by many languages, names have a tendency to modify. distinct languages use distinct instruments of sounds, and for something as commonly used as someone's call, the audio gadget have a tendency to favor sounds that are already element of their languages. This probable got here about even previously the names were written. Jesus spoke Aramaic by determination, and probable his disciples did, too. although the hot testomony is written in Greek, so the names were already adapted to that language even as first written (except for those which includes Luke, which began out as a Greek call for a Greek human being). Translations into Latin lined translating the names again. in case you study the Bible in a language except English, you'll locate the names in kinds worry-free in that language. for instance, John turns up contained in the kinds Johann, Ivan, Sean, and so on.
2016-11-30 01:11:24 · answer #3 · answered by kobielnik 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Though some have thought about it, it would not be a bright idea since for one every nation with nuke would launch everything they had and within 30 min every hint of life would cease to exist.
Nuclear Holocaust... is that what you want???
2006-12-01 18:36:10 · answer #4 · answered by John 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
GOOD IDEA!!! Let's do the same to North Korea too! And show them all who has the best technology! But then again, we wouldn't be any better than the terrorists who flew those planes into buildings on 9/11, now would we?
2006-12-01 18:34:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Radioactive oil is not good oil. If it were not there, Bush probably would have done so a long time ago. Actually, if the oil were not there, we wouldn't be there anyway. I would say that if we were to nuke anyone, it would be North Korea, but that isn't going to happen with NATO.
2006-12-01 18:44:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
If you are so eager to kill why don't you specify how bad you want to kill women and children. No you say "middle east" because you don't actually want to kill people you are just scared.
I am a American Solider. I don't want to kill innocents or anyone for that matter. All I want is for you not to have to wear a burqa and so you are able to freely speak your mind in yahoo answers.
I think you should help the effort by reading the Constitution and mailing some Christmas cards to our troops instead of taking your time to offend people with your hatred.
2006-12-01 20:14:47 · answer #7 · answered by clear1130 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Aside from the fact it would plunge the globe into the most catastrophic event in mankinds time upon Earth, I'll give you 3 reasons.
1. Oil
2. Oil
3. Oil
2006-12-01 18:38:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Possibly because of all the innocent men, women and children who would die, and the total desabilization of the middle east. Where.........coincidentally the world gets a lot of its oil.
Really dumb question.
2006-12-01 18:36:36 · answer #9 · answered by Norton N 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
that's not politically or morally correct. What if they bombed us because of our politicians... oh wait, they did. Not fun. Not all the people in the middle east are the cause of this either.
2006-12-01 18:39:15 · answer #10 · answered by phe_03 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋