2006-12-01 17:57:52 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Boxing
I have always wondered about that. I think you read my mind. You know for all his talent he never really went out of his way to fight the good fights. There were a lot of good fighters in the middleweight, super middleweight, light heavy weight divisions or a very good fight at crusierweight. He never fought rematches, its just a shame he could have been so much greater. This would have been a great fight. They are both cutesy fighters so who knows to close to call.
what I would like to ask you is I wonder why he didn't fight as a welterweight, when he first started his career.
2006-12-02 18:23:18 · answer #1 · answered by Bru 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jones would have killed him. Chris byrd has no punch. Hes not a good fighter. He never beat anyone good. I looked at a comment saying jones has no defense. Thats funny. Hes one of the hardest guys to hit maybe in the history of boxing. He fought vinny paz and paz went a whole round without being able to land a single punch on him. He uses his speed and moves to avoid being hit.
2006-12-02 06:37:32 · answer #2 · answered by nypokerplayer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I favor Byrd also. Roy has a very limited defense, and if Chris catches him with one good shot the fight is over.
2006-12-02 03:57:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
believe it or not but I favor byrd he is fast enough to catch roy and I think he was big enough to inflict damage....byrd is just the kind of heavyweight that would cause roy trouble...I pick byrd by ud
2006-12-02 02:08:20 · answer #4 · answered by keith j 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This bout is so boring that the fighters themselves decide to give the public their money back.
2006-12-03 02:13:24 · answer #5 · answered by smitty 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋