no. if there was no damage to either car and both parties agreed then just going on your way is the right thing to do. in the future though if it happens again and the car at fault drives away then record his license tag as if you don't then you could be held accountable for the accident if there is damage.
2006-12-01 11:25:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by george 2 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You might have gotten away lucky this time. Once you left the scene, It was there word against yours. Hopefully there won't be a next time for you, but if there is, make sure you exchange information, and try to get everybodys license plate that was involved. then write down every detail you can remember, including dates and times, keep all the information, just in case somebody gets home, and said, wow, I have whiplash, and that guy ran into us. You hitting the back of them, you would lose.
2006-12-01 11:26:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Speedbuggy43 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is a good thing that you did not exchange information. I have heard of people exchanging information even though there was no car damage and everyone was okay. Then later, one of the people involved said that the other guy was at fault and sued him.
2006-12-01 11:25:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by maggiepirsq 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
legally it should have been reported,,but since its done over with i wouldnt worry about it,like you said there wasnt any damage,but if the other person decides to be a little mean about it,thay can say it was your fault,and have an estimate wrote up on there car,and try and make you pay for it,,this is why its important to report anything like ths,but you,ll probably be alright this time,,good luck with it,i hope this help,s.
2006-12-01 11:33:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by dodge man 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
you should have called the police and had a report done. the car that left "left the scene of the accident" probably cause they didn't have a D.L. or insurance or something, but info should have been exchanged. sorry, but atleast damage wasn't done and you are ok
2006-12-01 11:24:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by chantal h 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is one of those local law questions, but in many places if damage is less than a certain amount it is not required to report it.
2006-12-01 12:08:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
you will possibly not prefer to hearken to this, yet you're at fault. The reasoning coverage will use in this occasion is which you weren't conserving a secure following distance or weren't paying interest. in case you're taking a seem on the drivers handbook it says (in NJ) to maintain one automobile length between you and the motor vehicle in front of you for each 10mph you're traveling. working example, making use of at 50mph potential you may have a distance of five automobile lengths between you and the motor vehicle in front of you. in spite of the rationalization the motor vehicle in front of you slammed on its breaks, in case you have been conserving a secure following distance, paying interest, and your motor vehicle replaced into stunning maintained, there could be no rationalization so you might strike the motor vehicle in front of you. rather, not many human beings abide by making use of this straightforward rule of thumb besides the fact that it remains the main suitable element to do in case you do not prefer to reason a fender bender.
2016-12-18 06:04:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well that's standard procedure but welcome to the american way of life.... "You hurt?" "No, you?" "No," "any damage?" "No....." "Me either" "Lets not get the law involved they take too damn long to get here anyway" "Sounds good"
2006-12-01 11:24:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by Hobo Joe 1
·
0⤊
0⤋