English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

For the most part being over weight is more dangerous to your health. Unless you were significantly under weight then that would be more dangerous than being say 30 or so lbs over weight.

2006-12-01 09:07:55 · answer #1 · answered by paulamcneil1223 3 · 0 0

less than. at the same time as a large style of the international perceives being overweight as undesirable, i imagine that isn't any longer as undesirable as being 50 pounds underweight. If I were 50 pounds underweight, i might want to weigh 70 lbs. even inspite of the actuality that i'm 5' 3", i'm fairly constructive i might want to be in the well-being facility with that weight. you do not see a large style of 70 lbs adults walking round on the line in evaluation with heavier adults. on the different hand, if I were one hundred seventy, constructive i might want to have some well-being subject matters, perchance diabetes and the such, despite the indisputable fact that it really is so much better treatable than the different option. no longer that i'm advocating being overweight, yet you may want to workout, and eat in good structure to get decrease back to a better bodily in good structure weight. wish I helped. :)

2016-10-08 01:42:23 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I am smallish and I would rather gain 4 stone than loose 4 stone I think being underweight is worse except that not many people in the west become underweight.

2006-12-01 09:19:28 · answer #3 · answered by wicket 2 · 0 0

Well It Depends On The Size Of The Under Weight Person Or Over weight Person

2006-12-01 09:20:01 · answer #4 · answered by scs_rbrt 2 · 0 0

The question is based on a wrong argument. Both conditions are different so not comparable.
Underweight makes the body weak therefore vulnerable and unprepared to work like it should.
Overweight doesn't mean that your body has an excess of "good food" it means you are accumulating excess of fat, making your body to suffer with more weight and abusing of your organs with additional work.

You can't ask if to being hit by a bullet is better or worse than being hit by a knife. Both are bad... no one better than the other.

Both options are a way of being unhealthy

2006-12-01 09:10:21 · answer #5 · answered by b4contact 3 · 0 0

I'd say overweight, because there is already a strong link between it and heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, certain cancers, and infertility. Being extremely underweight likely isn't great for you either but it isn't as common a problem so they don't tell much about the ill effects of it on us.

2006-12-01 08:59:13 · answer #6 · answered by GEEGEE 7 · 1 0

They are both bad, but if you are otherwise healthy, then being overweight has more serious health risks.

2006-12-01 09:00:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

underweight

2006-12-01 08:56:49 · answer #8 · answered by soobee 4 · 0 0

overweight is sooooooo bad,coz if u r overweight you will become ugly but you won't if you are alittle underweight

2006-12-01 09:00:00 · answer #9 · answered by DEATHMETAL 3 · 0 2

both of them are worse.

2006-12-01 09:02:20 · answer #10 · answered by JAZZiEEBOO♥ 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers