How can you be sure you know anything?

Question

If were are just random balls of matter that can think. How do we know that anything we see or think true is true? How did a concept of truth even come about? If we evolved then how can we know anything?

Answer 1

Another reason to PRAISE GOD!
He has given us minds, a conscious- look at how the human eye has been designed! The intelligence of man- and how many things we have accomplished and made throughout the centuries. Yes it is amazing- It still amazes me that people have not "woken up" to the realization that God is real and is God over us. But The Bible also says:

Romans 1:25
They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.

-Some just do not want to accept that there is a God. I cannot imagine my life without Him!

Answer 2

You are talking about Epistemology. It is a study of how we know that we know. Consider the physiological processes involved with even the notion of knowing and what it took for us to be able to do that and even make a choice based on what we have come to know. Have you come to know something and evaluated courses of action? Have you discovered that you made a mistake in your thinking or actions. Well then you have observed evidence of your knowing and thinking capacities. You may have even realized a prick in your conscience when pursuing a course of action which has impact on the life of another. Think about these things. You may want to consider the work of Francis Schaeffer, especially the book "He is there and He is not Silent" which deals in part with the subject of Epistemology.

Answer 3

We didn't evolve. And your question on how I can know anything... I will quote the french philosipher René Descartes, "I think therefore I am." The first question to knowing anything is knowing that you are there. Do you know that you are alive somehow? Even if you are imagining the whole world and this is just some sort of dream you are still somehow alive. So you know that you are alive.

Answer 4

I can't.

And it's utterly unimportant that I cannot. This is a fun thing to think about and argue about in philosophy class, but it's application to life is....negligible.

I act as though I know things. I act as though things are real. I act as though the waking world is the "real" one and the world of dreams is "false".

why? Because otherwise I'd spend all my time questioning every thing and not LIVING.

And for me, living its where it's at.

But if you want to have a go at solipsism, I'll play, too.

Answer 5

The inescapable self as quickly as greater arrives homestead. Descartes in basic terms proved that he replaced into or that"I" isn't greater advantageous than an entity able to theory. Of that i could be constructive. that's my adventure of the right here and now and that i'm answering your question. i will't be a hundred% constructive that that's particularly you asking the question or maybe that descartes proved the factor. the two a sort of realities and all else "I" become responsive to might in basic terms be products of the thinking entity this is me. this is to assert all in my international, each little thing I have interaction with would possibly no longer particularly exist, settle for in my recommendations. Is it then a theory that perhaps, "I" myself am no longer greater advantageous than a projected introduction from the theory this is Descartes himself? a trifling introduction in a international of pseudo mind's eye of yet another? Are all of us probably in basic terms the fabricated from an others theory technique? if so then the thinking entity could be GOD and all else of introduction of fanciful theory. you may by no potential doubt that one is thinking, perhaps we'd undertaking the beginning of theory and in turn undertaking our own very life. this could be an impossible activity. faster or later we'd desire to return to a end, one that could enable us to exist and have interaction with the international we settle for to be as genuine and tangible as all the evidence might help. because of the fact the life of something in basic terms before theory might require faith, faith and theory, then that's genuine seeking to infer that "I" am yet an entity this is able to theory. there is no suggestion which could lead on any have been else, so that's the "fact 'I' could settle for"

Answer 6

We know everything that God, the Flying Spaghetti Monster tells us.

We can check him out online there:

http://www.venganza.org/

Answer 7

I think. Therefore I am.