Nothing, as far as i can tell...
2006-12-01 04:35:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by nik 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Grammatically? No period after the statement and no apostrophe in the contraction "what is". Logically? Assuming it is a true statement, you have no evidence to back it up. However that's beside the point because there is no god.
2006-12-01 12:34:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by hot carl sagan: ninja for hire 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It assumes the existence of a God with human characteristics i.e. the capacity to love which as anyone with a basic understanding of philosophy will tell you is pretty difficult to prove, so it's only conjecture.
2006-12-01 12:38:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
1. it is beyond your capability to know the mind of God and
2. God makes no such claim and in fact clearly states the opposite.
2006-12-01 12:37:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by mzJakes 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's not consistent with the concept that that same God sends some of us to burn for eternity.
2006-12-01 12:37:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by . 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The interpretation of love?
2006-12-01 12:38:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by jmmevolve 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
That they claim to 'know' how God feels and they are implying that he definitely exists.
2006-12-01 12:34:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Pico 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
There's no god?
2006-12-01 12:40:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by mutterhalls 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because you left out the second half "And if you don't accept Jesus will have to burn you forever when you die."?
2006-12-01 12:34:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Laptop Jesus 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
nothing what so ever it's completely true
2006-12-01 12:35:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋