2006-12-01 03:50:50 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Food & Drink ➔ Other - Food & Drink
There's a lot more nutrition in the meat. Plus the skin is pretty much fat.. but who cares when it's so tasty!
2006-12-01 03:59:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Fried chicken or anything else fried really isn't beneficial to one's health. But if you have to eat fried chicken, eat white meat not dark and do not eat the skin. Absorb excess grease with a napkin or paper towel.
2006-12-01 04:26:12 · answer #2 · answered by Princess Me 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Meat.
2006-12-01 03:52:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
man the skin is the best part in fried chicken, just put some hot sauce and dig in. its ok to eat them once a while
2016-05-23 07:53:39 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the skin though nice and crisp is delicious it has a high fat content whereas the meat doesnt, so i would go with the meat if you want to eat healthy
2006-12-01 03:58:48 · answer #5 · answered by gypsy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both is full of fat. But the skin is full of it. The meat, I'd say.
2006-12-01 03:54:00 · answer #6 · answered by jojobass86 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's nothing nutritious about fried chicken. Any nutrition is outweighed by the fat that clogs your arteries and makes your brain misfire.
2006-12-01 03:59:39 · answer #7 · answered by $Sun King$ 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
THe meat has more nutrition
2006-12-01 03:55:01 · answer #8 · answered by fancyname 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the meat,the skin is where all the fat is
2006-12-01 04:30:01 · answer #9 · answered by oldjr 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You had to actually ask this question? The meat and it is even healthier if you don't fry it, but broil, grill or bake it skinless.
2006-12-01 03:54:25 · answer #10 · answered by dddanse 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋