I firmly believe, after what research I've done, that honey IS effective as a wound dressing, that it can serve as an antibacterial agent when applied to a wound.
My question is this- how does honey compare with conventional, modern antiseptics/antibacterial agents, such as neosporin, or even peroxide? How does it compare in both its ability to prevent or treat infection, its ability to help wounds heal, and in any possible negative effects?
It has come to my attention recently that the typical peroxide solution can damage tissue, and that neosporin can sometimes slow down healing by keeping the cut moist. But is honey an effective alternative, and how effective?
If anyone has sources in addition to your answers, it would be MOST helpful. God bless you all, and thanks!
2006-11-23
16:33:16
·
4 answers
·
asked by
The Link
4
in
Health
➔ General Health Care
➔ First Aid
By the way, I'm mostly concerned with how honey compares to over-the-counter treatments for smaller wounds and cuts, but any information beyond that is welcome too.
2006-11-23
16:34:20 ·
update #1
I know all about the risks of giving honey to infants. I'm talking about treating adults or children, not infants. I deffinatly know honey is not a 'mirical antibiotic', but I do believe it is an effective treatment when used in appropriate situations. I'm just not sure HOW effective, which is something I'm hoping to get at least an inkling of here. Nevertheless, thanks for the answers so far!
2006-11-23
16:45:38 ·
update #2