That's the dumbest question I've ever heard. That's like saying if you know you're straight why don't you have sex with a homosexual to prove it?
2006-11-23 13:37:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Carl The green's keeper 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
President Bush did not commit any war crimes. God! It makes me sick to hear people talk crap like that. As far as him having a world tribunal court decide, screw you for even suggesting it. Go to a different country if you feel that way and take any dumb Asses who have the same feelings with you. This is good old America and we don't play that ****, you freaking moron. You are so bent on your political party you would sell an American down the river. This is a military forum and guess what. We don’t throw our people to the dogs, much less our President who is our Commander in Chief.
2006-11-23 16:53:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Shiva07 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually a fact, Bush pulls out of World Court, then Bush has cut off ALL AID to any country unless they had agreed the not vote against Bush or any GOP American politician for war crimes against humanity in the World Court. If you don't believe me let me know, and I will take the time again to look up the the name of the Bill. There is some pretty interesting reading below, Unless you believe ignorance is bliss, Read what the rest of the world says
2006-11-23 15:01:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jon J 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Gentlemen, I believe I need to repudiate every point a certain idiot made earlier.
1. Those civilians being targeted and tortured by our directed energy weapons were all volunteers.
2. The military does not attack, threaten, or mess in a negative manner with the civilian population, it is banned under the charters for all of the military branches except in the case of martial law, which everyone can agree has not been declared.
3. Protect citizens from what exactly?
4. Failure to investigate what wrongdoing?
5. These are not criminal acts...and were done with due process ratified not only by Republicans, but by a fair number of Democrats as well...so if these two parties so splintered in the midst of all that is going on...how can they both approve it, and renew it three years later...AND IT NOT BE CONSIDERED DUE PROCESS?!
You have been tried, tested, and found wanting.
Former Marine
Sempre Fi!
2006-11-23 14:22:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Silly, everyone knows that ONLY the United States, represented by George W Bush, is the judge-, jury- and executioner-in-chief. Only HE can decided which world leaders have committed war crimes and crimes against humanity, then take all our hard-earned tax money and invade the offender's country, hunt him down, and have a puppet government put him on trial for war crimes. The several hundred thousand IRAQI civilian collateral damage casualties are a small price to pay for FREEDOM and DEMOCRACY and KEEPING US SAFE HERE AT HOME!! Besides, W would just plead the FIFTH and then he couldn't testify against himself, question himself, or pronounce judgment on himself. Case closed.
2006-11-25 09:41:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by RER 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
As an American citizen to ask a question like should be considered treason. Would you let another country (or group of countries) come in to our congress and decide if the laws we have are just? I would hope not. We should not allow any other country or countries to make question our country in that manner. President Bush does have to answer to the American people, but he should not and will not answer other countries.
Besides what war crimes are you talking about? Ridding Iraq of a Blood thirsty Dictator. I am thinking that to be a good thing.
2006-11-23 15:44:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mike E 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Boy talk about a loaded question. 1. He hasn't committed any war crimes to speak of. 2. See answer 1.
Answer me this, what crimes do you feel he has committed? From what I see and know, he responded to aggressive acts from a warring nation(Iraq). Because Iraq and Saddam signed a armistice with the allied powers following Desert Storm, he had to abide by condition set forth. It is fairly clear, Saddam didn't do so, therefore, the resumption of hostilities.
2006-11-23 16:21:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by pblxgshman 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, their cronies, all Republican Neocons and all clever idiots who voted for this evil, mendacity criminal and blood thirsty monster ought to stay trial beforehand a international tribunal on conflict crimes. I want that all of them would be sentenced to do time in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
2016-12-17 15:16:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course it's because he ISN'T innocent, and in the hands of any other country, he would be strung up at Sadam's side. I think the only thing we can find comforting, for now, is that the Lord sees all, and will judge us accordingly.
2006-11-23 14:10:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by anne.meradith 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Any crime he commits is a wartime crime seeing he considers we
are in a hundred year war.
But torturing american citizens on United States of America soil
with directed energy weapons and lasers causing heart problems
and vision loss is # 1.
#2 Using US military to hunt, track, stalk and attack citizens.
#3 failure for US Justice Department to protect citizen from harm.
#4 failure of FBI to investigate criminal wrong doing of government.
#5 Taking a americans "Freedom" without due process or charges.
2006-11-23 13:45:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋