Three days ago I asked for some suggestions about what I saw as a major problem getting the perception right on a painting I had done. There were many answers, ranging from changing the color schemes to the painting not falling into the ‘normal’ rules of painting. With this being a surrealistic work those suggestions were pretty much ignored. But to those of you who helped with the perspective problem I thank you greatly. I was too close to the work to see the obvious and you saw it for me. Again, I thank you.
The before:
http://pics.livejournal.com/unmired/pic/000309qd/g11
The after:
http://pics.livejournal.com/unmired/pic/000315tw/g11
The floor was tiled, the door was raised and the rear wall was lengthened to add depth of field. I also made the chairs and table larger to help the woman appear smaller.
Now, what can you find wrong with the painting?
2006-11-23
13:03:48
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Doc Watson
7
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Visual Arts
➔ Painting
God, might I suggest that you take the time to view the paintings I have in my Live Journal Blog?
http://pics.livejournal.com/unmired/gallery/00002xgc
And, by the way, I've been painting seriously for twenty years and have already sold two-thirds of the nearly 400 hundred paintings I've done. My work seems to sell in part because I couldn't care less about the conventions considered the norm. Nor do I think artists like Klimt, Gauguin or Magritte worried too much about following normal conventions. I only tried to concerned myself with such guidelines when I was teaching.
2006-11-23
14:42:14 ·
update #1