English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If Enough Cities, Counties, And States
Took The Lead From Cities Like Hazleton, PA
And Farmers Branch, Texas
And Maricopa County, AZ
And The State Of Colorado
ie :
Passed Laws Against HIRING ILLEGAL ALIENS
And RENTING To ILLEGAL ALIENS
Restricted State And Federal Funding
(Health, Education, And Welfare Benefits)
From Non-Citizens
The Federal Government Would Have NO CHOICE
But To Federally Blanket The Nation
With Similar Restrictions And Laws

WE THE PEOPLE At A Local Level
(City, County, State )
Definitely Have The Majority

Agree Or Disagree ??



Reason of Violation:Chatting & Personal Communications

I KNOW This Question Should NOT Have Been Deleted
I'm, NOT Looking For An Eplaination WHY It Was Deleted
Or HOW
I Already Know Who, Why, And How

Answer The Question Please

2006-11-23 09:44:11 · 10 answers · asked by JD 1 in Politics & Government Immigration

10 answers

i agree,

2006-11-23 18:01:46 · answer #1 · answered by loretta 4 · 0 1

i don't understand why this question could have been deleted, yet I accept as true with assertion that the federal government could would desire to blanket the country with comparable rules and regulations, yet possibly not for the clarification which you may think of. the federal government would not would desire to respond to to any state or community government. And the federal government already has jurisdiction interior the area of immigration. whether, on the grounds that we've a representative republic style of government, if adequate community governments accompanied such rules, assuming that they've been accompanied below tension/enter from the known public/community citizenry everywhere in the country, the individuals of Congress who serve those areas could experience compelled to respond to such tension from their components, besides, and so which you may see the end result indicated. So, while you at the instant are not the final option interior the assertion that WE the human beings on the community point honestly have the final public, it somewhat is real that we the human beings on the community point could have the final public, if adequate community areas all agree on the comparable difficulty (which infrequently happens).

2016-10-12 23:59:30 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

If all the cities and states did that, the federal government would sue them for some idiotic reason.

2006-11-23 09:52:27 · answer #3 · answered by firewomen 7 · 0 2

Yes, you are right. Since the Feds refuse to enforce the laws, the states should.

2006-11-23 10:02:30 · answer #4 · answered by GOPneedsarealconservative 4 · 0 1

Disagree. Every human being deserves to live in a decent room.

2006-11-23 09:50:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

I would've flagged it.

You're posting a rant, which is not a question. This is not a blog, or something like FreeRepublic.com or DailyKos. You're abusing this forum by posts like yours.

2006-11-23 09:54:57 · answer #6 · answered by geek49203 6 · 2 2

There must have been a mistake. I don't see anything like personal communication.

2006-11-23 09:50:56 · answer #7 · answered by JudiBug 5 · 1 2

Yes sir- I most definately agree with you!

2006-11-23 09:46:33 · answer #8 · answered by Coke&TVdinner 2 · 1 2

If people do not like it they should go somewhere else but there is not reason to delete questions.

2006-11-23 09:49:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

totally agree!!

2006-11-23 09:52:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers