no they r not
2006-11-23 09:06:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by huh? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
A Little from the History:
...The violence unleashed by the Pakistani forces on March 25, 1971, proved the last straw to the efforts to negotiate a settlement. Following these outrages, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman signed an official declaration that read:
Today Bangladesh is a sovereign and independent country. On Thursday night, West Pakistani armed forces suddenly attacked the police barracks at Razarbagh and the EPR headquarters at Pilkhana in Dhaka. Many innocent and unarmed have been killed in Dhaka city and other places of Bangladesh. Violent clashes between EPR and Police on the one hand and the armed forces of Pakistan on the other, are going on. The Bengalis are fighting the enemy with great courage for an independent Bangladesh. May God aid us in our fight for freedom. Joy (A Bengali Word that means win) Bangla. Sheikh Mujibur Rahman 25 March 1971
(Source: "The History of the Liberation Movement in Bangladesh" by J. S. Gupta)
Sheikh Mujib also called upon the people to resist the occupation forces through a wireless message.[8] Mujib was arrested on the night of March 25-26, 1971 at about 1:30 a.m. (as per Radio Pakistan’s news on March 29, 1971).
Pakistan tried to fight back and boost the sagging morale by incorporating the Special Services Group commandos in sabotage and rescue missions. This however could not stop the juggernaut of the invading columns whose speed and power were too much to contain for the Pakistani Army. On 16 December, within just 12 days, the capital Dhaka fell to the Mitro Bahini — the allied forces. Lt. Gen.A A K Niazi surrendered to the combined forces headed by its commander Lt. Gen. Jagjit Singh Aurora by signing the Instrument of Surrender at Ramna Racecourse, 16:31 Indian Standard Time. Bangladesh became liberated.
2006-11-24 11:08:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mantra 6
·
4⤊
3⤋
i just now that ur question shows how much Islam is better than Hindu because in Islam we don't have people who are untouchable every one is the same as the other, the rich and the poor the king and the workers have all the same quality the only think that can make a difference between someone and someone else is how much he had worked in this life.
2006-11-23 21:42:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by suma 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Of course they are, only this week it was found by the Indian government that Indian Muslims are beneath the lowest cast on the Hindu social ladder, and some people are surprised that the Muslims wanted their own country, geez!
2006-11-23 18:15:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mr Slug 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
hindu lover, aka hindus are napak, aka hindus are najass, aka krihna's dalit etc, etc. you have just been reported once again for your insulting postings.
2006-11-25 05:12:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
im a bangaliâ¥
but a MUSLIMâ¥
2006-11-24 14:46:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by ♥Jus Tellin Da Truth Mandem♥ 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Where are you coming from???
2006-11-23 17:09:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by groovy chick 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
nope, muslims cant help themselves they discriminate
2006-11-23 17:07:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bryn L 2
·
1⤊
6⤋