There may never be any such proof. To try and prove that there is no God would be as time-consuming and utterly pointless as proving that there is not a china teapot in orbit around Pluto. That is to say: the probability of such a thing existing is so vanishingly small that we can safely assume that it does not exist, even without evidence.
2006-11-23 06:28:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
evidence that God exists could be seen all around you. the project is that maximum individuals won't settle for the evidence. only evaluate how complicated and interdependent the existence kinds you spot accepted are. do away with bugs and a brilliant sort of the pants and timber will now no longer reproduce. do away with water and each thing grinds to a halt. replace the stability of the make up of the air we breathe and we now no longer exist. replace the make up of our environment by an exceedingly small quantity and existence will become insufferable. This stability and interdependence cries out that there is a God who's the author of existence on earth as all of us recognize it immediately. with the aid of actuality that the interdependence is so heavily balanced evolutions might desire to in no way have worked. The fossils – confident they exist they're dug up oftentimes. the present existence equipment has basically existed for 8 to 10 thousand years. that's what the Bible shows; it additionally tells what the destiny holds for us. Giving mankind a wish for the destiny via faith in Jesus and the prospect of reconciliation God has offered.
2016-10-04 07:11:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No one needs to have any such "proof".
If I say that there are white ravens, it's not up to you to prove that there not white ravens, it's up to me to prove that there ARE.
But that's missing the point of religion.
Aand THAT is far too big a topic to get into right now. I know, I've said that on a number of questions, but I'm working on what will turn into a longish essay, and
1. It's not finished yet
2. It will be something too large to be posted here, so I'll just post links when it's done
2006-11-23 06:26:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Praise Singer 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, there's nothing that one person can show another, either to prove that God exists or that He doesn't. God is Spirit; it's absurd for people to insist on physical proof of a non-physical Being. I know He does exist, because by His grace I kept my mind open and kept seeking Him long enough to prove it to myself, but that proof is something that each individual must seek for him or herself.
2006-11-23 06:45:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes its called evolution....and the evidence is in the fossil record..and carbon dating and the fact that the earth is more then 6,000 years old like Christians think....how does this prove there is no god...because the bible is inaccurate...the bible says nothing of evolution. and its historically inaccurate. If the bible is the truth word of god..then nothing would be incorrect in it right? Christians believe that God Created everything....but anything capable of Creating anything must start from a certain point and evolve. A creative "intelligence" such as a God would have to come from somewhere and thats just not possible
2006-11-23 06:26:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
No, it is impossible to disprove a negative.
I also can't disprove the celestial teapot, the invisible pink unicorn and the flying spaghetti monster, but that doesn't mean they exist.
The onus is always on the believer in the unseen entity to prove it exists, not on the skeptic to disprove it. And extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
I suggest you visit the link for an easy to read review of the arguments against god's existence.
2006-11-23 06:33:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Depends on your definition of God. If you're speaking specifically of the Judeo-Christian concept of God, we can state that he does not exist with a very high degree of certainty.
One significant piece of evidence towards this conclusion is the fact that the Abrahamic God incorporates mutually exclusive characteristics. (ie: He is both benevolent and wrathful. He is both omnipotent and jealous. etc.) As a self-negating concept cannot be true, it is incredibly unlikely that this concept of God is true.
A second significant piece of evidence is the fact that this concept of God defies natural laws (most notably, the Laws of Conservation). Because we have enormous amounts of mathematical and observable evidence that supports the truth of these laws, we must conclude that it is very unlikely that God, in this conception, exists.
2006-11-23 06:42:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by marbledog 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, there isn't any proof god doesn't exist, but there is no proof god DOES exist either. Believe in it if it makes you happy.
2006-11-23 06:26:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by Buchyex 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
There is no such proof...just as there is no such proof that Harry Potter isn't real. So now my question to you is: Do you believe in Harry Potter? If you say no, then why? There's no proof that he is fake, so he must be real right?
2006-11-23 06:26:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by ~ Sara ~ 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
As Bertrand Russel stated, do Christians have proof that a celestial teapot is not orbiting some distant planet? I have faith that it is-any Christian care to prove me wrong?
2006-11-23 06:36:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋