Here. Have a look at this video. Then, please explain the evidence that is given in it if you can.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gs1zeWWIm5M
Do you still hang on to thinking that one species cannot become another?
2006-11-23 05:35:38 · 13 answers · asked by Snark 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Def of... this is not "visuals" it is an excerpt from a lecture given by a biologist.
2006-11-23 05:39:34 · update #1
Pearly Gator... who told you that? That's the strangest argument I've heard in a while and has nothing to do with the video, so I must assume you didn't bother to watch it.
2006-11-23 05:49:17 · update #2
SETFREE - Apparently, you didn't understand or weren't listening.
There are 48 chromosomes, 24 PAIRS. A PAIR (a pair means two) fused. Do the math. :)
2006-11-23 05:54:19 · update #3
hey, that's cool!
apes have 48 chromosomes
humans have 46
your guy says 2 chromosomes fused
By the way, we DO have a common ancestor, God created us all
DO THE MATH
if you have 48 chromosomes, 2 of them fuse together, you now have 47 .
all his gobbledygook doesn't explain why of the millions of transitional species fossils that would have to exist for us to have a common ancestor none NOT ONE have been found
2006-11-23 05:49:22 · answer #1 · answered by SETFREEBYJESUS 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Interesting, but it still proves nothing conclusively in the light of Pluto being a planet one year ago and not today. Science is famous for backpeddling the moment the evidence changes.
All this shows is different base pair. We can only assume it was fused because of how the evidence may seem to be, but one day biologists make find or see, first hand, something that gives a different point of view or refutes this.
It isn't even time to send the jury in for deliberations.
If you do, you risk looking like a scientific fool if someone else discovers something else.
For all we know, the science of Evolution, in realtive terms, can be as infantile as the sciece of Astronomy once was when Astrologers dealt in the field.
Let's face facts, these "Fortune tellers" devised some elegant math and algorithms to accurately predict the return of planets, so they weren't total fools.
Astronomy today, however, is totally diffrent from what it was 2000 years ago.
Evolutionists today, may look entirely differeint in 2000 years from now.
You also don't touch on the fact that Modern Science now beleives MAN evolved as a separate and distinct species.
Hence we are now faced with two Scientific views. Ape-Man to Modern Man and Primitive Man to Modern Man theories.
Now, in the Bible it is said that God Created woman out of Man's Rib.
Technically, that's intellegently designed evolution.
The big CONFRONTATION still remains which YOU are not addressing.
The CONFRONTATION is about the Ararchists or RANDOMISTS vs the Creationists.
Randomists say put enough chemicals into a test tube and let monkeys shake it up for a billioin years and you might get a protozoa.
Creationists say that one day Science will play God and clone, meld, fuse, splice and alter genomes and chomosomes to "create" a new species.
In other words intellgent design.
If the RANDOMISTS are so RIGHT, then what is the need for THEORETICAL science!
Why do we have THEORETICAL phsyics and biochemistry.
What is the REASON TO PUT INTELLENGCE behind the process, when things will happend RANDOMLY as nature desires.
SCIENCE should ONLY be here to explain WHAT HAPPENED RANDOMLY, not to put INTELLENT DESIGN in an applied manner!
IF scientists do that, they are addmitted RANOMISTS are wrong or they want to speed up the process from 1 billion years to 100 years.
Is that WISE!
Intellegent design is a reality and one day SCIENCE will play GOD and MAN will have MORAL issues to deal with.
Read Brave New World by Huxley. That day is coming.
Intellegent Design is HAPPENING in the labs!
Why, if RANDOMISM made the Universe, does MAN want to tinker around with it!
Obviously scientists, deep down inside, think there is a creator, an all wise being and they want to catch up to that way of thinking!
2006-11-23 14:25:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
How verifiable is it?
Genes analyzed in a billion dollar laboratory. Few people can actually do that.
And how the heck can he be a Christian after he admits that?
And WHAT are the chances of the very same two chromosome fusing that changes us from monkey to man, plus all the other mutations and stuff? What is the probability of that?
2006-11-24 09:02:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
And? Have you heard about the Qur'an? I can give you a website to check it out and it will change your point of view about evolution. www.harunyahya.com Check it out and don't be fooled by these visuals and videos.
2006-11-23 13:44:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Preaching to the choir, baby!
But I'll watch anyway.
:-)
DAMN that was impressive. Definitely a credit to theists everywhere. Glad to see some are open minded and receptive to scientific truth.
2006-11-23 13:38:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
this is a good question, i only wish that the answer to this would be more that ''it's the work of satan or it's just a man's piont of view''
2006-11-23 13:45:17 · answer #6 · answered by Laughing Man 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Do you still realize chances are you won't change them?
Posts like this are starting to get old
2006-11-23 13:44:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Animals cannot exist without the plant food chain. How did those two life forms occur simultaneously?
2006-11-23 13:40:46 · answer #8 · answered by Pearly Gator 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Thankyou, man. I was getting tired trying to explain this...
Peace x
2006-11-23 14:06:41 · answer #9 · answered by lady_s_hazy 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Creationists will not think this is proof. They think that knowledge is the work of Satan and that this is a trick against God.
Good find by the way.
2006-11-23 13:40:57 · answer #10 · answered by acgsk 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋