"In a 1982 survey of 68 major scienttific journals showed that of the 135,000 scientific manuscripts submitted to these journals only 18 were on creation "science". Not one of these 18 manuscripts was of suitable standard for publication." If creation "science" wants to be taught along side real science in schools shouldn't its research be able to stand up to the scrutiny and inquiry of other scientists and be eligible for publication in main stream science journals? Is it the case that creation "science" is bunkum?
Source
Telling Lies For God
Ian Plimer
Professor of Geology
University of Adelaide
Ramdom House
1994
2006-11-23 03:10:00 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
'Real science' is made up, and has no place in reality, so when the Bible teachings are presented, the so called 'scientist' automatically reject it as being made up. They won't let reality into their fantasy.
2006-11-23 03:15:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Nia: >> But they should not suppress the scientists that believe in a counter-theory, that being that there is a God.
'God' doesn't go in science. Science is based on naturalism, not supernaturalism. This is why these papers never make it in - they exclude it because they're not real science. As they should. That's the bottom line.
If I wrote a paper saying: "Astrological predictions are really right most of the time!" I expect that to be rejected from a scientific journal, because it's not real science. It's not verifiable.
2006-11-23 03:17:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I cant see how Creationism can be a science, can they provide any proof, such a carbon dating to give the age of relics being really young not like previously thought, or fossils etc etc
How can you prove we were made from dirt????
2006-11-23 03:22:01 · answer #3 · answered by Claire O 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are right. Because scientists have chosen to take God out of the equation, the next best guess is evolution. All these articles you refer to are written with the pretense that God does not exist. They are not written to try to prove that God does not exist. Each writer has already decided that He does not. Once the Author of all true science (God) is removed from the equation, scientists are left to their own imaginings as to how things evolved to where they are today. God gives enough evidence of His existence so that those who are honestly seeking Him will find Him. However, He does not remove all doubt. He gives enough light so that we can find our way but not enough to blind us and take away our freedom of choice.
2006-11-23 03:17:45 · answer #4 · answered by 19jay63 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Okay. But who has the power? Whose worldview is more dominant in the field of science? The evolutionist worldview. So, of course they're going to try to smother any indication of intelligent design in the field of science because of their staunch worldviews. I'm not saying that the evolutionists can't say what they want to say or believe what they believe. They have that right. But they should not suppress the scientists that believe in a counter-theory, that being that there is a God.
2006-11-23 03:14:30 · answer #5 · answered by . 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Creation science is a misnomer. Creationism doesn't employ proper scientific methodology so it isn't a science.
2006-11-23 03:15:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
in case you had studied geology (which I quite doubt), you would be attentive to that there are 2 significant branches: actual geology and historic geology. actual geology is the variety they use daily and is per watching, testing, and demonstrating. that's the variety they use to do their mining and such. historic geology is the attempt to appreciate the historic previous of the earth and its foundation. That has no place in useful life.
2016-10-12 23:35:50 · answer #7 · answered by dusik 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe in creation, but old earth. I believe it will stand the test.
2006-11-23 03:18:31 · answer #8 · answered by RB 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
God gave us one chapter on creation and left it at that if someone wants to believe in evolution then they have more faith than i do
2006-11-23 03:15:36 · answer #9 · answered by Terry S 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It can, now we have more reliable research and a prominent one is linked below:
2006-11-23 03:20:59 · answer #10 · answered by Damian 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋