hey everyone, :-)
i need a bit of help to decide, would you say this would be a good tattoo to get?
http://www.temptatts4u.com/images/TKC198-3-celestial-bands.jpg
(however ^ that link, is for tempery) would you say, it would be good idea, to get the same design - but permenant?
oh and 1 more thing. - where would the best area be ^ to have it, if you think its a good idea.
thanks for your help. xx
2006-11-23 03:06:45 · 6 answers · asked by CMJohnson-1988 3 in Beauty & Style ➔ Skin & Body ➔ Tattoos
There are pros and cons to temporary tattoos. The pros are you get a chance to "try on" different tattoos to see how you feel about it before actually committing to a permanent one. They give you many different ideas for designs and from trying them on you can weed out what you like and don't.
The cons of temporary tattoos are these are designs ANYONE can get a hold of. There could be a hundred or more different people world wide who have decided to get this exact same tattoo done permanently. It's along the same lines as someone walking into a tattoo parlour and picking something off the wall. There isn't any originality to that.
Obviously this is the kind of style you want and if those cons I mentioned don't matter to you then go for it. But I would take some time and make it my own if it was me.
With that style it's a band type tattoo which you can place around your arm, wrist, calf, ankle etc.
I do strongly suggest using those as just ideas for your own creation. Something that will be meaningful to you for years to come.
Good luck!
2006-11-23 03:41:02 · answer #1 · answered by Ersabette 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i personally would not get that tattoo. it is very generic and flashy. is there nothing else that you can think of that would mean more to you? rather than that you could think of something, ANYTHING and take it to an artist and have them sketch out a tattoo for you. my advice is to be original. get something that is unique for you. after a while when you see people with the same generic tattoos as you have, i think you'd wish you had something that was different. good luck tho.
2006-11-23 03:39:07 · answer #2 · answered by somebody's a mom!! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They're pretty and would probably look nice around the ankle.
I believe in reserving my body for tattoos that have personal significance to me, though. If you're gonna get a tattoo, I wouldn't go for a pre-designed one if I were you. What's the point in that?
2006-11-23 03:19:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
well, i think all three is a bit much. how about just one of them. i think that type of tattoo is for your arm, but you could also have it on your back. i think it should be in a bronze, gold ink if they have any.
2006-11-23 05:41:02 · answer #4 · answered by dreamer 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they are pretty. I would do it either large (or the size on the computer) on the lower back or smaller on the ankle.
very pretty, though :)
2006-11-23 03:23:52 · answer #5 · answered by ♥sweet♥ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ask ur friends, not the internet. then if u choose a really stupid one someone suggested, than ur stuck w/ it for life.
2006-11-23 03:13:56 · answer #6 · answered by agalicktourq 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋