2006-11-23 02:17:03 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Any who says "yes" to this supports:
Selling own daughters into slavery
killing farmers who grown 2 crops in same field
killing women who wear material made of 2 different threads
killing children if they badmouth the parents
NEVER borrowing boney unless free of interest
And so it goes on, MOST of the above is from Leviticus by the way.
So ANYONE who has a credit card and fails to pay it off in full each month is going against the bible, ditto anyone with a mortgage.
2006-11-23 02:23:50 · answer #1 · answered by Mark T 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the bible is in inerrant word of God yes in it's original form, however there have been some errors on the part of translators and publishers over the years, but as far as contradictions go, there are none, although many people seem to think there are, there really aren't. people just forget to take into consideration, the time the bible was written and the audience it was written to. those all play a major part. the speech was different back then also.
2006-11-23 02:20:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, the purpose of inspiration was not to establish an inerrant Word of God. To do so would require that man be taken out of the equation because man does err. God alone is infalliable. The purpose of inspiration is to direct us to a knowledge of God and to eternal life through His Son, Jesus Christ. There is an underlying harmony in scripture that any honest hearted person will discover. The Bible was not written to tell us how many angel were at the tomb of Jesus or how old Jehoichin was when he started to reign. If that is what you are seeking in the Bible, you will find contradictions. If, however, you are seeking the kingdom of God and His righteousness, then the Bible is the book for you.
2006-11-23 03:09:32 · answer #3 · answered by 19jay63 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe that the Bible is the inspired, inerrant Word of God. And, before you ask, yes there are some who will point out difference in the Gospels, for example. Some of the differences found are easily explained - were there two angels at the tomb or one? Two are mentioned in one Gospel, while only one is mentioned in the other, but only one spoke. Just because the second angel is not mentioned does not mean it was not there. Others are more difficult to explain, but there is an explanation - I just don't know the answer, yet.
2006-11-23 02:23:35 · answer #4 · answered by padwinlearner 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
As a whole, yes. But, yes there are errors in the Bible, placed there on purpose be the Catholic Church, an example; all of the verses that tell you that there is a trinity ARE NOT found in the original manuscripts!
2006-11-23 02:24:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the original texts had little error and held the vein of reealed truth right through,modern versions still contain this vein of revealed truth also but some errors may be due to modernistic language that by it`s nature can lose the meaning of the original word.
2006-11-23 02:24:23 · answer #6 · answered by Sentinel 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the Bible is knowingly full of errors as would be any tome written over 1500 yrs. but the overall continuity is intact and that is what you look for to discover the messages and the meanings for mankind...
2006-11-23 02:20:31 · answer #7 · answered by The walker 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yup! The earth is flat. Bats are birds. And the earth was made in 6 literal days. My favorite bit is how it took Him half a day to whip up all the billions of planets, quaasars, black holes, stars - and a full day to make man! We are JUST that special! (And difficult to make! Must have something to do with putting our skin on)
2006-11-23 02:21:18 · answer #8 · answered by Black Parade Billie 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
God cannot do mistakes . Isaiah 34: 16
so Look in the scroll of the LORD and read:
None of these will be missing,
not one will lack her mate.
For it is his mouth that has given the order,
and his Spirit will gather them together
Go to www.christiananswers.net
2006-11-23 02:28:47 · answer #9 · answered by Theresa 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. At some time it may have been error-less, but man corrupted it, and still continues to do so today.
2006-11-23 13:36:46 · answer #10 · answered by The Pope 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋