If you want our Troops "Home" contact www.afznpomr@riley.army.mil and www.lampstaff@leavenworth.army.mil This is Fort Riley Kansas and Fort Leavenworth Kansas. Also e-mail Inspector.General@usdoj.gov and Congress at firstgov.gov . Let them know what you feel. God Bless our Troops!!!!!!!!!!!!! Herbert West III Pre-Presidental Candidate for Nov 2008 http://www.wen2k.com/tell.php?Id=952 {952}.www.west.herb@yahoo.com
2006-11-23 01:14:44 · 11 answers · asked by west.herb@yahoo.com 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Also see me at http://www.wen2k.com/tell.php?Id=1019 and http://www.wen2k.com/tell.php?Id=817 Thanks again Herbert West III www.west.herb@yahoo.com
2006-11-23 01:17:38 · update #1
YES, A.S.A.P.
2006-11-23 01:16:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Yes eventually. If we leave now it will be worse off than it was before. Here is the situation.
If we leave two things can happen....One, the weak government crumbles and some kind of dictatorship or ethnic cleansing anarchy arises from the ashes......or Two the weak democracy prevails and very slowly gets to its feet and grows in strength.
However if we dont leave only one thing can happen. We strength the government to a point where it can stand on its own then leave. This will happen much faster if we stick with it.
leaving is for narrowminded short-sighted pansys who dont see the obvious side affects from simply abandoning the newborn government.
2006-11-23 01:27:25 · answer #2 · answered by Elite 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Western troops need to begin handing over control of the country to the local forces.
Simply walking away at this point would be turning our backs on a horrible civil war, but so long as the coalition is seen to be propping up the government there it will never be strong enough to stand on its own feet.
2006-11-23 01:32:26 · answer #3 · answered by Vanguard 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
talk approximately an emotionally charged barrage of questions... i don't think of maximum troops elect to be deployed a time-honored time, not to point a 2nd or 0.33. besides the undeniable fact that, they sign in for the provider properly attentive to the certainty that they are signing as much as be deployed. Do they elect to bypass to a warm, grimy, smell **** hollow in the middle East for exciting? No. yet they have their motives. As for conflict, i think of maximum people could agree that for the duration of a perfect international, conflict does not exist. it relatively is not a perfect international, nevertheless, and there have consistently been and could consistently be armed conflicts, regrettably. optimistically, we will not bypass to conflict with Iran, yet Israel would not elect them to have nukes. regardless of in spite of if it relatively is morally desirable or in spite of if Iran is on the brink of having nuclear weapons, in actual certainty that Israel won't enable them to definitely get them. desirable or incorrect, that's what that's, and the USA is on Israel's area.
2016-10-12 23:29:09 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush created such a mess that we will have to send more troops to stbilize the country, before we can draw down troops
2006-11-23 01:41:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
from someone who's son is on his third tour of Iraq yes our troops should come home but only after the job at hand is successfully completed
2006-11-23 07:39:35 · answer #6 · answered by mark_grvr 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they should come home when the job is done and are country is free of any threat from that mountain dwelling coward osama
God Bless America and God bless and protect our Troops
2006-11-23 01:23:37 · answer #7 · answered by Colby H 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
They should come home when the job is done.
2006-11-23 01:30:14 · answer #8 · answered by Vtmtnman 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, when the job is DONE!
2006-11-23 01:17:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
When VICTORIOUS !
NO CUT AND RUN !
BRING THEM HOME WITH PRIDE IN A JOB WELL DONE !
2006-11-23 01:27:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
They're already home but wrong one.
2006-11-23 01:17:09 · answer #11 · answered by Pishisauraus 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋