English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-19 23:45:02 · 15 answers · asked by إمام سليم چشتي 5 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

The origin of the Anthrax letters has never been established, if this were the work of terrorists wouldn't the bush administration be more insistent on finding out who did it? And if they were never found out why didn't it happen again?

The beltway sniper? What garbage.

If there is such easy access to guns and explosives as evidenced by numerous non-terrorist attacks, why are there not more? Maybe it is because Bush has lied to us about 9/11 and about the real level of danger from terrorists.

2006-11-19 23:55:07 · update #1

Party_Pam: the Democrats don't "want" to come in, they were elected in. I guess you really don't like Democracy?

2006-11-19 23:58:31 · update #2

15 answers

Because we are now watching for them and stopping them before they can do it again.

2006-11-19 23:47:38 · answer #1 · answered by Texan 6 · 4 3

Politicians are incorrect approximately issues continuously. yet... 9/11 exchange into one in all 2 Al Qaeda appropriate assaults on American mainland soil on condition that 1993 (the different exchange into the attack on the united statesS. Cole in 2000). it relatively is not basically like the U.S. exchange into being bombarded by utilising Al Qaeda previous to Bush's presidency, so which you won't be in a position to declare that that's Bush's rules that have saved the native land risk-free. Secondly, Liberals bash Bush usually simply by fact American imperialist rules, like invading distant places international locations under fake pretenses and then having their leaders killed, are what piss terrorists off in the 1st place. As such, many liberals argue that the conflict in Iraq is only going to reason greater beneficial terrorists threats sooner or later. desirable now, Al Qaeda is in hiding, however the occupational rigidity in Afghanistan is getting smaller, so we are in a position to probably assume to confirm a backlash in some unspecified time sooner or later. The final attack earlier 2000 exchange into in 1993, and we are only now drawing close the seventh anniversary of 9/11. Who knows of what can ensue. possibly some liberals have been incorrect with their predictions of an attack interior a 300 and sixty 5 days or 2 of 9/11, yet wasn't Bush incorrect while he declared "venture achieved" in 2004?

2016-10-22 10:06:07 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Because the Bush administration has done a good job with keeping the terrorists on check. Now the Democrats want to come in and change everything Bush has done. Mark my words, when a Democrat becomes President the attacks will happen again.

2006-11-19 23:53:08 · answer #3 · answered by party_pam 5 · 0 3

1. The FBI, Immigration, the police, and our consulates abroad are doing a pretty good job.

2. But the main reason is because, most Muslims are NOT terrorists. In fact, the Wahabi Hirabis are just a little fringe group. But a nasty one. Real Muslims have read the Koran and know the difference between jihad and hirabah.

Oh, and Larry, it was actually President Clinton who was warned about Osama Bin Laden, and he decided to ignore it.

2006-11-19 23:51:09 · answer #4 · answered by Freedom 4 · 0 1

the bush administration established the dept of homeland security.... they have been very busy.....it took awhile to get security up because clinton had cut military and other securtiy budgets by 30%.

the war in iraq, unpopular as it is....has seemd to have kept the terror activity overseas....

since the democrats are softer on security and they are in power, i expect a reversal of security, a retreat from iraq, concessions to terrorists groups for the sake of peace, and increased terrorist activity in this country...

2006-11-20 00:03:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Don't worry,your pals the democrats are slowly making their way into the white house.Expect attacks after the next presidential election.

As far as attacks up till now,I'd bet on racial profiling,and because Republicans aren't soft on national defense.

2006-11-20 01:16:33 · answer #6 · answered by Vtmtnman 4 · 0 0

There have been, they just don't get reported as much. Remember the Beltway Sniper, or the Anthrax Letters, or...

2006-11-19 23:47:18 · answer #7 · answered by Barabas 5 · 1 2

Batman.

2006-11-19 23:55:05 · answer #8 · answered by bad_ass_dave_thomas 1 · 1 0

There were none like it for 200 years before. The Bush Administration was asleep. They were warned by French and Israeli Intelligence, and also elements within the FBI. Bush is the WORST PRESIDENT EVER.

2006-11-19 23:48:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

Because we have their attention focused on us in Iraq, this is a good stategy, but it will not last, it at least will buy us time to prepare for the attcke that I believe will come.

2006-11-19 23:48:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

They try to blow up planes headed toward the U S ,but failed

2006-11-19 23:54:47 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers