I mean, if you compare "Dr." Hovind's beliefs on creation and evolution with modern scientific thought, this is the only explanation one could come up with. What do you think?
2006-11-19 18:10:08 · 5 answers · asked by Nowhere Man 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I 100% agree with that.
2006-11-19 18:14:28 · update #1
Evolution is not 'full of holes' - there is plenty of evidence supporting evolution and a common descent.
Just because something seems "illogical" does not make it so. It seems rather "illogical" that we are sitting on a spherical globe, spinning, and rotating a sun, while floating in space. Yet, this is exactly what's happening.
Evolution does not violate the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics states that in a closed system, things tend to go towards disorder, not order. However, the earth is not a closed system, because we receive energy (in the form of heat) from the sun.
If "the theory of entropy" (I have no clue what this is) is just a theory, why do you support it? You don't support the theory of evolution.
The title of Darwin's work was "The Origin of Species", not "Origin of the Species". Darwin was an evolutionist. He believed in his theory.
There are plenty of transitional forms! Australopithecus afarensis! Homo hablis! Homo erectus!
2006-11-19 18:28:34 · update #2
Kent Hovind is incapable of telling a complete truth. He relies on meaningless analogies, empty rhetoric, misapplication of scientific principles and outright lies.
Take the second law of thermodynamics: what happens when you leave your car in the Sun? It gets hot. Why? The Sun provides energy to Earth. If the Sun provides energy to the Earth, life can overcome the entropy by utilizing some of that energy. Life and evolution are impossible without input of energy. That's the second law of thermodynamics in closed systems. Fortunately, Earth is not a closed system. Kent Hovind makes such pseudoscientific babble that his followers cut and paste repeatedly.
2006-11-20 02:50:29 · answer #1 · answered by novangelis 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
The only thing scientific about evolution is that it has been shot through full of holes, and is mathematically illogical. It violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. It violates the theory of entropy. In "Origin Of The Species" even Darwin refused to believe the theory. There have never ever been any transitional forms found in any fossil record. So why haven't you done you homework on this?
I Cr 13;8a
11-19-6
2006-11-19 18:17:11 · answer #2 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
No they are not! The 2nd law of thermodynamics is "broken" by the theory of evolution, you still state the same old argument that the earth is a open system so the the 2nd law isn't applicable, don't you know that that evolutionist "comeback" has been de-bunked.
The 2nd law says that the world tends to increased entropy, which means it tends to disorder, please tell me what happens when you leave your car outside in the sun???? The sun causes even a more increase in entropy, please go review your thermodynamics textbooks before stating outright lies!!!
2006-11-19 18:52:28 · answer #3 · answered by Christo 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I think Kent Hovind is doing a great job. What he says comes straight from the Bible.
2006-11-19 18:14:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Creation "Science", what a joke. It's not "science" by any definition of the word.
2006-11-19 18:11:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋