this is a wierd question, but it is in relatio to a movie "the 12 angry men".
2006-11-19 10:45:19 · 3 answers · asked by simplychux 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
On a jury the only time you get to talk is during deliberations, and all the projects that I've worked has allowed me dialog throughout the whole project. Pretty different if you ask me, if my experience is any indicator.
2006-11-19 10:49:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's a huge difference.
Juries reach a single conclusion, whether it is Guilty, Not Guilty, or Hung Jury. Two words is the most they need to say about it.
Group projects are run by committees that try to reach as many conclusions as it takes to get everyone on board. The dynamic is that everyone on the committee wants to be able to take credit (I made them decide it would be Red) without taking responsibility for a failure (the size wasn't my idea, I wanted it larger).
2006-11-19 19:24:02 · answer #2 · answered by open4one 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is always one or two who know it all and would never admit they are wrong.
There is one or two who demand to be in charge.
There are those who will go along with whomever yells the loudest.
There are those who will do whatever is easiest or requires no effort on their part.
There are those who want to execute without thinking it through.
And, there are those who want to do the right thing.
2006-11-19 18:54:29 · answer #3 · answered by howdigethere 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋