Our Problems, what do you think?

Question

After analizing the world situation, political scientist made up a list on how to solve mankind problems; this is what they came up with:
"We need a RADICAL change socially, politically, economically, religiously, etc... And they added, 'we all agree that the solution is a benevolent dictator rulership

Could you think of any human that would fit the description?
or Are they talking about our Creator God?

Your opinion please.
If you do not want to answer seriously, refrain. Thank you.

Answer 1

The answer is man does not have the solution, no matter how much he loves himself.

Answer 2

This is a serious answer:

What the heck have YOU been reading?! What study, or report, are you referring to?

Numerous humans thoughout history have been "benevolent dictators," arguably including our current President, though of course most dictators are less than benevolent. Interestingly, some of the most infamous, cruel and inhuman dictators force their people to call them "benevolent leader" or some such, the most visible perhaps being the current leader of North Korea

Whom do you think they are talking about? God, or a human leader?

And what whacko "political scientists" all agree that the solution to all our problems is "a benevolent dictator rulership"? (which isn't even reasonably proper English, by the way, just pseudo-intellispeak designed to make someone who doesn't have a clue sound intelligent and profound).

Answer 3

No man can fit that shoe because inherently imperfect. Only a perfect being who does not have any bias to a particular creed or belief and who sees the effects of his action can be a benevolent dictator.

However, because no one is perfect, the struggle for a better society would have to be fought out by people of different ideas, creed and bias - and that is the beauty of life - the interplay of power.

In the end, people will realize that a pefect solution for a perfect society does not exist because we are imperfect - only the struggle for a better one.

Answer 4

They provide a fascinating answer, and a fanciful one.

I don't think a study was needed to say that if we had a noble entity that could take control of the world and solve all of its problems, then the world would be in a better position.

Instead, how about providing an actual solution?

Answer 5

Hey you know the old saying, power corrupts etc, no dictator in the history of civilization has been benevolent, the two terms are a contradiction.

Answer 6

I can't think of any human that would fit that description No. But I don't imagine that they are talking about God because they probably don't know Him. But I do know that He is the only answer to our problems. And I do know that He will one day come back and solve all of them.

Answer 7

I doubt if a benevolent dicator is possible as power will always corrupt. God won't work either. Much of the world problems stem from the fact that there are so many different opinions on who or what is God and whether he or she exists at all.

Answer 8

i think of maximum of the folk of our complications come from resistance to alter, no be counted if this be the guy, a partnership, a team, soceity, u . s . a . or authorities. it particularly is the ego of those it particularly is the reason at the back of resistance to alter, and for this reason the EGO that creates complications. human beings style collectively as communities of like techniques, and this then creates EGO team complications, affecting extra human beings. Nature would not have complications because of the fact there is not any ego. however the ego is a robust ingredient, because of the fact it particularly is an intermediate step that helps us to make options and exercising our loose will, which builds our experience and that's a facet of our increasing know-how or spirituality. So then as we talk we see a international with increasing style of complications, and this has to do with egos getting extra beneficial and extra beneficial. The ego itself is proof against replace, because of the fact the will of the guy is 'to stay to inform the tale in any respect expenditures'. The advantageous area of it is that the increasing complications we are developing recent to us on an known basis possibilities to be taught a thank you to conquer our tendency to need to 'now not replace'. The extra complications we've, the extra we can be forced to alter if we would want to stay to inform the tale. via gaining expertise of a thank you to narrate to on an known basis complications and respond in a distinctive thank you to it then we had interior the previous, then we triumph over our very own resistance - we alter our condioned way of responding. each and each time we try this, our complications and the international's complications replace into much less. So then I see it as all and sundry's very own challenge to narrate to complications that take place, and be taught to apply one's creativity to hit upon new techniques for us to respond to 'on an known basis existence complications'. The extra those that tackle this challenge - to alter themselves and triumph over their very own resistance to alter - the fewer complications the international would have, and subsequently the extra love. Betsy

Answer 9

Scientists are their own worst enemy. They fight to disprove the spritual things and knock themselves out to prove the scientific theories. When God in is all knowing wisdom has said, he takes the simple things of the world to confound the wise. They have no personal, one on one knowledge of God per se. The stuff they come up with has already been said, discovered, etc. There is nothing new under the sun. That's what Solomon said.

Answer 10

To even suggest that they are referring to god indicates that you are unable to understand that much of the world's population does not believe in god or has a different god to the one you are referring to. Therefore this would not be a solutiion