2006-11-19 07:07:18 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Travel ➔ Italy ➔ Other - Italy
no
2006-11-19 07:19:30 · answer #1 · answered by debbie 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The name Rome was built in a day but the buildings and landscape was built soon after
2014-06-17 05:41:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
youve got the saying wrong dear, the saying is (rome wasent built in a day) meaning that things that are worth waiting for .......
2006-11-19 07:18:05 · answer #3 · answered by steven m 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if New York was built in ten minutes
2006-11-19 07:12:25 · answer #4 · answered by murphy51024 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope
2006-11-19 07:08:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
um... no...
In fact, that is the way we denote that things take time ... to say
"Rome wasn't built in a day"
2006-11-19 07:11:43 · answer #6 · answered by D B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, it was destroyed by fire then the emperor at the time decided to rebuild it out of marble and it took 4 years to rebuild at a massive cost.
2006-11-19 21:41:44 · answer #7 · answered by Catwhiskers 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course it was silly,,and the moon is also made of blue cheese
2006-11-19 07:20:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course not! it takes a long time to build a thriving settlement
2006-11-19 07:09:02 · answer #9 · answered by July 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no but it fell in a day
2006-11-19 07:11:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
lots of yes and lots of no's
i know and you know that
only god knows.
2006-11-19 07:09:14 · answer #11 · answered by askance 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋