very high, thats like using a sheet of paper to stop a bullet.
2006-11-15 19:18:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
extra to the point, no matter if it does decrease the probability of HIV in Africa, what does that ought to do with circumcising newborn American boys who received't also be sexually lively for yet another 15-twenty years? also, why does u.s., which has the optimal circumcision price of all industrialized international places, actually have the optimal HIV price? the individuals who tout HIV prevention because the recent reason to circumcise by no potential look to have an answer for that. countless "study" were performed contained in the most suitable century to attempt to locate motives to continuing justifying circumcision. on each and every occasion a study comes out that looks to instruct some well-being income, besides the undeniable fact that small, the circumcision proponents eagerly spotlight it even as they ignore all the different study that confirmed no income. an similar is authentic for those HIV study. those that confirmed an major help in probability were given a lot extra publicity than those that did not. there replaced into yet another study in Tanzania in 2009 (by Stallings et. al) which found that females those who had gone through woman genital mutilation had type of 0.5 the HIV probability of unmutilated women people. humorous, i do not listen anybody utilizing that study as a reason to circumcise American toddler females.
2016-11-29 04:40:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe it is about 1 in 12 without a condom, with a condom that stays intacked 0% (I don't know what rate condoms fail (small hole - come off etc) but I think it is low) If a condom fails 1 in 1000 times (which I think is conservative) the probability would be
1/12 * 1/1000 = .0000833 (8 people in 100,000)
2006-11-17 20:15:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by IDP 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I suppose it is minimal, as long as the condom stays intact during the act. Nevertheless I advise that the woman should take some blood test, just to be sure of her health.
What else, just careful with such experiments, one's health is more important than pure pleasure
2006-11-15 19:25:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by venitoo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its still a high risk.
Talk to your doctor so you can learn more about HIV/AIDS.
2006-11-16 12:08:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Brey 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The risk is low but present.
2006-11-15 19:18:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ivan 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
if you use a condom it is safe. but don't use the animal skin one. and you make sure you be careful. they can break. and make sure you don't have no open sore's down there around and make sure he don't either.
2006-11-15 19:24:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by mama_papa_babybear 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Frankly, the risk is not worth it.
2006-11-15 19:19:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Some Guy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋