Friends say yes, but it doesnt make sense.
Also, how did the first person get an STD? Doesnt make sense.
2006-11-14 09:54:00 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health ➔ Diseases & Conditions ➔ STDs
Intercourse is not required to contract an STD. If the person thinks they may have been exposed to someone with a STD, then they should be tested regarless. If you are sexually active, then you should be tested regularly anyway.
2006-11-14 09:56:43 · answer #1 · answered by Dave 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No if both of you are vergins you dont need 2 be tested because if neither of you ever had sex there is no way you can have a std because you get a std from having sex with someone who has 1.... If you are not positive that he is a virgin then get tested because he could be lying and he could have a std and now you could have a std but if you are postivit that he is a virgin and you are a vergin then no need to get tested.... but you might be pregent.... And the 2nd question how did the first person get an std that was asked alot in my health class last year and I dk the answer.....
2006-11-14 09:57:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I even have by no ability heard of a sprint one being born with HPV and that i additionally understand that maximum youngsters have a great gamble of even ridding their bodies of HPV. i grew to become into at the instant clinically determined and characteristic researched alot and up until a definite age mid to overdue 20's you are able to each so often rid your self of HPV. I additionally understand that 80% or extra of the inhabitants has HPV...virgin or no longer. Unknown to maximum people, HPV is unfold via dermis to dermis touch, consequently condoms do no longer take care of you from it and you do no longer purely get it from sexual touch. you ought to have a wart on your hand, plantar wart on your foot, and so on...and that they could be HPV. HPV has many varieties that's why that's transforming into to be such a scourge and maximum of people have it. the only thank you to verify is for women to request an HPV attempt for the duration of there pap smears, maximum docs do no longer attempt for this until a woman has an weird and wonderful pap smear effect. subsequently abstinence would not ward off this STD.
2016-10-22 02:29:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
People will have a tendency to lie about their sexual activity. Also, sometimes people are ignorant of what consitutes sexual activity. Or, they are not fully informed about the many ways to actually contract an STD. It is not always by "standard" penetration.
Go to a good health site and ask the hard questions to clarify this. It is about health, not about morals.
2006-11-14 09:58:03 · answer #4 · answered by Monica M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Even without being sexually active you can still come into contact with herpes and other std's. Better to be tested no matter what the situation is.
2006-11-14 09:55:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If I were you I would still go and get tested anyway,because some men will say and do anything to get a woman to have sex with them. If he loves you he won't have a problem with it and it would ease your mind and maybe his too.
2006-11-14 11:32:28 · answer #6 · answered by heartyangel98 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you two really like each other, why to bother. None of the firsts--Adam or Eve--had STD.
2006-11-14 10:47:58 · answer #7 · answered by Ashok S 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can never be certain someone is a virgin simply by their word. And you can never be certain you are the only partner. I think you should get tested and protect yourself regardless.
2006-11-14 09:56:40 · answer #8 · answered by James J 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes because the other could be lying. If your partner is honest they should not care about a test
2006-11-14 09:55:37 · answer #9 · answered by keith s 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you probably don't need to worry about getting tested if you trust your partner is telling you the truth; however do not have unprotected sex even if you are on birth control
2006-11-14 10:56:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋