2006-11-14 09:42:19 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health ➔ Diseases & Conditions ➔ Heart Diseases
The heart is an involuntary muscle, which means it moves without your conscious control over it.
Your leg muscles are voluntary muscles, which means they move when you consciously intend for them to move.
2006-11-14 09:48:03 · answer #1 · answered by steve d 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yep......I dont think there is any other way that it can cause you sure cant think of it and make your heart pump......and its a good thing is pumps involuntary i would hate to have to think of pumping my heart all the time just to stay alive I have enough on my mind without having to add that to it :)
2006-11-14 09:44:59 · answer #2 · answered by kndykisz 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. If you took out someones heart it would still beat and pump blood.
2006-11-14 09:44:18 · answer #3 · answered by sarahharris25 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, some body functions are involuntary because if you had to think about them in order for them to work and you got distracted, what was that...........
2006-11-14 09:44:36 · answer #4 · answered by smartypants909 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
> "Which got here first – the blood or the heart that pumps the blood?" The blood. there are a number of examples of organisms with blood yet no heart; merely above a undeniable length is a heart required to bypass the blood. > "Did the physique evolve a heart with the aid of fact it needed it?" variety of... the heart stepped forward to permit length-advance in animals. > "How did the physique proceed to exist whilst the heart hadn’t yet stepped forward? Or became into the physique alive and not making use of a heart?How did that paintings?" The animals have been sufficiently small that no heart became into required; diffusion became into sufficient to bypass foodstuff and metabolites. > "Did the floor exist till now the blood shaped? How did the floor stay alive with out blood?" not "epidermis" as we at the instant have; merely a membrane (now and lower back cellular, now and lower back not) which risk-free the organism. > "If epidermis became into in a position to stay in that state, the place did the oxygen come from, and why did blood unexpectedly choose oxygen to maintain it alive?" Like I reported: that's a length predicament concern. > "Did the lungs variety with the aid of fact they have been needed to tug in oxygen for the heart?" Lungs stepped forward from a changed swim-bladder in lungfish-like fish. those animals nevertheless gained maximum of their oxygen by using their gills. > "How long did it take for lungs to evolve, and how did the heart proceed to exist with out oxygen?" the heart stepped forward long till now lungs did (fish have hearts). And lungs took around a hundred and fifty million years to evolve (from the 1st visual allure of "proto-amphibians" to totally terrestrial amphibians). > "What solutions do the atheist evolution believers could desire to the abover questions?" the comparable solutions that the various theists who settle for evolution do.
2016-10-17 07:06:14 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah i learned that in 6th grade. its cause the heart is made up of cardiac muscle which is controlled by the cerebellum meaning that it works without us having to think about it.
2006-11-14 09:46:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
OMG! You didn't? Is this what you learned in school today? Keep learning okay sunshine. You are so special right now!
2006-11-14 09:44:38 · answer #7 · answered by CTargrl 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yep I know it and that some neurons work like that
2006-11-14 10:06:06 · answer #8 · answered by Marc J 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Otherwise I would have stopped it myself by now.
2006-11-14 09:43:34 · answer #9 · answered by Luken 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ummm, yeah. if it didn't we'd die when we went to sleep or something. and it's involuntarily not involuntary...fyi :-)
2006-11-14 09:44:25 · answer #10 · answered by skigrrl66 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋