LOL!!! I like your questions, very entertaining....
2006-10-25 23:30:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I would agree that it would be better in terms of reading and will help in understanding well. People during that time have the talent in drawing or depicting, art was never been strange during that time. The question here is why? The word of God was been taught plainly. Remember the law that prohibits in planting different crops in a field? I think, there is something about putting drawings that God did not allow since that time.
2006-10-26 06:41:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by The young Merlin 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Considering how the Bible is being interpreted these days I believe they would have resorted to special effects or trick photography.
2006-10-26 06:33:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by CRAnoop 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. I would've loved to seen what Jesus and all the apostles looked like and just the way things looked back then. What a neat idea.
2006-10-26 06:30:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I do not think so because ıt ıs not tobe a orgınal as god send us ıf god want send us wıth photo Also there more meanıng of one centence how they can phot
2006-10-26 06:34:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by musinmu 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
They say a picture is worth a thousand words.
2006-10-26 06:58:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by jean 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, but I don't know if the photo's would have lasted this long. They probably would have faded within recognision lol.
2006-10-26 06:32:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Steph :-) 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Much... Better... But to what sense is better? Better as in better arguments for the "phony picture" possibilities?
2006-10-26 06:31:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by thaheartoflife 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
No way!!!!Because do you thing parent will allow kids read Genesis or Song of Songs.(That's R-rated)
2006-10-26 06:44:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by It's Me! 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Then there would be more idol and goddess worshippers. How people can forget Dalilah, Salome, Mary Magdalene...?
2006-10-26 06:35:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, because faked photographs are very easy to expose as fakes.
2006-10-26 06:31:17
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋