....requests it for support, and then sit back in a peaceful region and watch what happens. Are you with me?
2006-10-25 21:40:42 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
i think you are an arrogant ignorant hilly billy
2006-10-25 21:50:44 · answer #1 · answered by Kalooka 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dividing Iraq into 3 will mean a Civil War and would be chaotic for the Iraqis.
2006-10-26 04:46:13 · answer #2 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's an easy to thing to say when you're safe in (insert Western country here), having never experienced a lack of power, food, or peace.
However, in Iraq, it's something different altogether. Real people are over here suffering. Think about it.
2006-10-26 10:56:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Human life is the most important thing. No one in Ohio or Virginia wants 40,000 of their moms and babies to die in civil war. Neither does anyone in Iraq.
Your plan doesn't take into account the fact that innocent people should not die by the thousands.
2006-10-26 08:37:54 · answer #4 · answered by superstar dj 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with SGT
How about we divide the country in to one area and we will only occupy that part that requests our support.
Wait that's what we are doing!
2006-10-26 05:48:38 · answer #5 · answered by MP US Army 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thats Exactly the PNAC and CFRs plan
2006-10-26 04:57:29 · answer #6 · answered by Species 8472 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, you're an idiot.
2006-10-26 04:45:57 · answer #7 · answered by SGT 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋