English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

From the ever-bubbling fount of knowledge, also known as Wikipedia:

"There is some interest in pork rinds as a healthy snack food due to the Atkins diet, since pork rinds contain no carbohydrates (unless flavored). They are, however, high in fat and sodium, and generally may be considered more delicious than healthy to those who enjoy them. In fact, the fat content of pork rinds is similar to that of potato chips, and the amount of sodium in a serving of pork rinds is nearly five times of that within a serving of potato chips. For example, a 14 gram serving of Utz Regular Pork Rinds contains 5 g of fat and 230 mg of sodium, whereas the same serving of Utz Regular Potato Chips contains 4.5 g of fat and 47 mg of sodium. Pork rinds generally contain 8 g of protein in a 14 g serving, more than any food except dried meats such as jerky. The fat content of jerky, however, is much lower. Microwaveable pork rinds are lower in fat than the deep-fried variety, with only 2 g of fat per 14 g serving and no saturated fat, although the sodium level may be as high as 350 mg per serving. The high protein content of pork rinds makes them more nutritious than some low-fat snack foods, such as fat-free pretzels."

There you have it. And around here, pork rinds go anywhere from 99 cents for a small bag to about $3.00 for a large size.

2006-10-25 17:08:35 · answer #1 · answered by Wolfeblayde 7 · 0 0

This Site Might Help You.

RE:
Are potato chips more healthier than pork rinds? And how much would a bag of pork rinds cost?
I am just curious.

2015-08-11 00:34:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Chips are healthier when reading the label... pork rinds may be a little better as they are pork skin, fried in pork fat. A bag would run about 99cents to $1.75 Everything is healthy when you consume in moderation, that's where we as a nation are failing.

2006-10-25 16:57:23 · answer #3 · answered by Porterhouse 5 · 2 0

pork rinds are healthier. its basically a piece of pork skin fried until only the matrix that hold it together is left. its lower in calories than chips plus no carbs or trans fats. a small bag is around 99 cents. try the bbq or vinegar if you need a flavor.

2006-10-25 22:49:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

potato chips are healthier since is containc less cholesterol compared to pork rind

2006-10-25 16:54:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Read the label, but I am pretty sure pork rinds have less fat and salt then potato chips.

2006-10-25 17:36:19 · answer #6 · answered by pastor_fuzz_1 3 · 1 0

Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips

2016-03-15 05:30:24 · answer #7 · answered by Karen 4 · 0 0

neither are healthy but I think pork rinds are healthier, they both cost about $1.99 per bag

2006-10-25 17:03:28 · answer #8 · answered by ~♥~Tiffany~♥~ 4 · 1 0

Actually, neither one are healthy....The only difference is that pork rhinds contain less calories and maybe a little less fattening......but both are really no good for you health wise.
As for the price of Pork rhinds.........a 12 oz bag will probably be about $2.25

2006-10-25 16:58:54 · answer #9 · answered by mom of a boy and girl 5 · 0 0

For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/avK9P

I just went to see "Paranormal Activity" and loaded my popcorn with Cheddar Cheese. It was so good, I also drank 64 ounces of Diet Pepsi (not kidding) due to the salt overload. Cheddar Popcorn

2016-04-06 02:47:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers