if you've had one of these cars and would like to comment about them please do so. or if you just know alot about the two car go ahead and comment. i am about to buy a 95 5.0 convertible ford mustang.
2006-10-25 12:33:58 · 12 answers · asked by manoyie1 1 in Cars & Transportation ➔ Car Makes ➔ Ford
The differences between the two are nil. 94 was the first year for the SN-95 body style. It is basically an improved version of the Fox chassis.
2006-10-27 22:24:22 · answer #1 · answered by tattedjoe 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1 Year
2006-10-26 00:38:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
1 year
2006-10-25 12:39:16 · answer #3 · answered by boarder4life52 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nothing at all. Although `95 was the last year of the 5.0 a.k.a the 302. After that they went over to the 4.6 modular V-8.
2006-10-25 23:47:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think that any changes were made between the '94 and '95 model years. The 90's body for the mustang sure is ugly though... Too bad I can't afford a post-'05 one... they're gorgeous
2006-10-25 12:42:42 · answer #5 · answered by rtsfreak5 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nothing is different between the years, i dont like them much, a bit slugish and the engines didn't seem as powerful as like the 87-93 mustangs. I had a 94 mustang, 5spd and i didn't like it at all, 93 mustang convertable was faster.
2006-10-25 15:50:44 · answer #6 · answered by bobbyzarlinga 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't own one but work on them all the time and really isn't any difference at all.. Between the 95year and the 96year I think was the change to a 4.6 from the 5.0 motor
2006-10-25 13:42:07 · answer #7 · answered by gearbox 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mustang < Mustang GT < Shelby
2016-05-22 14:01:29 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
94 is the box body and 95 is the newer style it is somthing have to know when you order
2006-10-25 13:42:10 · answer #9 · answered by oldslowchevy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nothing is different..But if you're looking to make one fast, I'd pick up a fox body mustang instead.
2006-10-25 21:14:53 · answer #10 · answered by . 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋