If religion is true and Evolution is false, where did the first God come from?

Question

If you can't tell this question is from an evolutionist atheist, what planet are you on?

Answer 1

That is unknowable.

However, the Universe began suddenly, from a singularity. It is unreasonable, and illogical to state is was uncaused. Inflation theories and Hawking's conversion of equations to imaginary numbers to avoid the singularity of creation are not realistic, and can never be proven.

Some people "postulate", God is eternal and is consciousness. I have consciousness and leading researchers in neuro-science are tending toward dualism, for consciousness is mysterious, and seems to be independent of matter.

Anyways, what caused the universe to begin, 13 Billion years ago.

For many good reasons, I believe a creator was involved. A creator answers many more scientific and philosophical issues, than impossibly unrealistic theories that take great faith to believe in.

Answer 2

jus leh mae sae this abou tha. Evolution seems to me to be an unverifiable theory because no one has ever produced a scientific experament that shows it's viability by producing predictable outcomes of a set of inputs. You know like if you drop two items off a building of differant weights at the same time they will land at the same time. Anybody can do it and check the results. This then is an experament confirming the the possiblity of a predictable existance of a reliable force at work, and explains some of the characteristics of that force.

I know that since we are dealing with a far more complicated force (the force of life) that this is a difficult process to verify and yet there is an experiment that has a high reliability factor that does produce reliable results. The problem is only that one has a hard time verifying that the experament was conducted properly by the one who wishes to obtain the proof.

Unfortunately this experament proves the existance of God the intelligent designer and not the theory of evolution.

The experament is spelled out in a very large book, in great detail. People who have conducted the experament and observed it's reliable results see it as proof positive. Anyone can read about the experament and do it and it produces an observable change in the person. Observable by the experamenter and the observers of the experament. It has often been documented at great length. The change involves both mental and physical behaviors. The problem with running the experament is that the results are most often permanent and the person must live differently there after, and things previously thought to be fun will no longer be fun, and things they thought would be boring are now fun.
sorry he spell checker did not work

Answer 3

far ago and long away in a vacuum unknown to man of this age there was were two opposing forces wrestling. Neither was very good at it because well there just had not been much practice. As they wrestled on positive pushing and negative sucking, then positive blowing and negative being still. The longer they wrestled the more polarized they became each developing and individual identity. Round and round and round they went gaining speed and there by the first time was on the scene, and although time was not consistant still there was a count of rotation that became observable, and infinity became an inevitability as the numbers of revolutions increased with every turn. Positive moved in and smacked negative and then circled out further away and then positive developed a method of maintaining a rythyme of circling and bumping in a rythyme and both strategy and the standardization of time were born and the forces wrestled on and on in their infinately patternized progression of forces in motion and time with strategy or what we call an intelligence in motion. and there was no longer a vacuum because it was filled with intelligence motion time and so space was created for they operated rotationally in a certain area, repeating over and over. The rythym space time forces and strategy had now become creative and God was now on the scene.
icheeknows

Answer 4

Why did you bother throwing evolution into the mix? It is unrelated. Your question holds up with no mention of evolution.

If religion is true, where did the first God come from?

I won't attempt any answer, but to say that anything capable of creating the universe, sentient or not, is beyond our comprehension. This is why it is a matter of faith.

I will also point out that "first God" is an oxymoron. Either you meant "God", the eternal, transcending time, or "first god".

Answer 5

Like most people on both sides of the evolution debate, you are assuming quite blindly that evolution and religion are mutually exclusive, when they need not be.

As of yet, there is actually more proof that religion and science are deeply connected instead of deeply separated.

To answer your question, I can only say that God's existence is a mystery that no one on Earth will ever understand.

What we do know about His existence for sure is that as Creator of all matter and life, He does not need to have been created.

That is the great mystery of God that requires faith from His believers.

Answer 6

Creationists reject the thought of evolution because of the fact they neither understand what the thought actual says and because they're unaware of the data for it. this is by way of the fact maximum of them get their incorrect information from mendacity creationist internet sites and books. @Martin S, to illustrate, repeats widespread creationist falsehoods and nonsense which he have been given from a e book crammed with creationist pseudo-technological expertise. He additionally stated what Solly Zuckerman reported approximately Australopithecus as though it became the main recent pointers on the undertaking. in certainty, Solly Zuckerman lost his argument that Australopithecus became an ape returned interior the 1950's. and because then, multiple further Australopithecus fossils have been chanced on which left little question that Australopithecus walked erect and became no longer in easy terms an ape. Creationists choose to cite his opinions as though they have been nevertheless a scientifically perfect point of view. in fact that the region of the foramen magnum under the cranium and the form of the pelvis point out that the australopithecines have been bipedal. extra: @Exodiafinder: "that query would not even make any sense. It contradicts itself." It would not make sense to you when you consider which you have actually no awareness of the undertaking depend. there is the certainty of evolution, that's is the changing of species over the years. that's a certainty because of the fact the data shows that's a certainty. there is the thought of evolution, which grants an evidence of the approach during which evolution occurs, i.e., organic decision of advantageous mutations. that's fairly no longer all that confusing to understand in the experience that your ideas isn't encased interior the cement of thought in historical fantasy.

Answer 7

He's omnipresent.He is the beginning and the end.He didn't come from anything because he has always been there.
Good question though.It's more than the mind can comprehend.He was there the whole time just sitting there looking at the cosmos before he chose to create the earth.

Answer 8

Surah 112. The Unity, Sincerity, Oneness Of Allah
1. Say: He is Allah, the One and Only;
2. Allah, the Eternal, Absolute;
3. He begetteth not, nor is He begotten;
4. And there is none like unto Him.

Answer 9

What does one have to do with the other. You already know that nobody knows where God came from. God says that he has always existed, and long before earth was created.

Answer 10

Man