It appears that the hospital is doing this to save on disposal fees. Any opinions? Is it any worse than having an abortion in the first place?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1725171/posts
2006-10-25 07:49:12 · 3 answers · asked by I Ain't Your Momma 5 in Health ➔ Other - Health
I'm pretty sure that they removed the tissue used in stem cell research before burning. At least I would hope so.
2006-10-25 08:32:31 · update #1
I have a problem with it because instead of disposing of these unwanted fetus' they could be using them for medical research. (stem Cell) I know that it is not approved in the United States but don't understand why not. There will always be aborted fetus no matter how everyone feels about it and we can't stop it so why not put them to good use.
2006-10-25 07:58:27 · answer #1 · answered by crenshaws_apache 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
abortion is wrong to begin with. i'm not stating my opinion, however i am stating the truth. these babies have no say in what happens. the women are right though-they have a choice. well that choice should be not having sex. what's even worse now is a hospital in the UK is burning the corpses of these poor little human-yes i said HUMAN-beings. i think that is some type of crime here in the US. burning a dead body? last time i checked, that's illegal. anyways, that's like your boss saying to you, "you're going to be unclogging toilets in our facilities from now on because you're doing an excellent job." not fair, is it? if you're doing such a great job, shouldn't you be getting a promotion?
think about it...
2006-10-25 15:04:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's fine with me, what else are you going to do with it? The fetus is dead, it has never had a name, it has never said a word, it has never paid taxes, it is just a lump of blood and guts, like any other pathological specimen.
2006-10-25 14:55:25 · answer #3 · answered by potential tourist 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋