I only thought about this recently, if I were a 'terrorist' in Iraq, I would want the foriegn troops out, these foriegn troops would move out pretty fast if there was no more hassle, wouldnt they? It must be a costly exercise keeping them there? Both financially and politically!
Why dont the 'terrorists' lay off until the foriegn troops are satisfied and go home, then when the coast is clear, go back into buisness and do whatever???
Yes I am aware the troops would return eventually but look at the cost?? Politically and financially!
Or have I over simplified the issue??
Why are foriegn troops still in reland, isnt that similar????
2006-10-25
05:56:03
·
7 answers
·
asked by
budding author
7
in
Politics & Government
➔ Military
'sexmagnet', that was fast, I had hardly finished typing the question!
2006-10-25
06:06:32 ·
update #1
AS Yahoo would say "whoops" I seem to have managed to post this question twice? Never mind it means 10 points to each best answer!! Yipeeeeee
2006-10-25
06:12:33 ·
update #2
'Jon c' excellent point
2006-10-25
06:37:27 ·
update #3