I'll answer your second question, since I don't know what Darwin believed. I'll answer it with a question. Why could not an all-powerful God or Gods choose the methods of evolution? You can drive a car, but you might choose to walk, to enjoy the process.
2006-10-25 04:43:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by lottyjoy 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
He was raised a Christian, and even at one point studied to become a pastor in the Anglican church. He took his trip on the Beagle almost on a whim, and it took him years to understand and codify what he found on that trip meant. He later told people (privately) that his research had made him lean towards agnosticism, since what he found contradicted many religious beliefs. His wife, who was VERY religious, tried early in their marriage to get him to attend church and forget his research, but he continued on (and almost never went to churce past the age of about 25).
In a letter he wrote when he was in his 60's, he told a friend that he still believed in god, or at least had hope that there was one, but did not believe in the god of the christian religion.
2006-10-25 04:53:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
His religious beliefs? He was Christian but became agnostic at some point in his life. He did not "convert" to Christianity upon his death bed, that fallacy has been vouched for by the relatives present at the time.
2006-10-25 04:48:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I have no clue on Darwin's religous beliefs.
Personally i believe in the theory of evolution, i think there is more evidence in favor of evolution than there is against it. i also believe there is a god, though i'm not a christian.....
2006-10-25 04:44:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I cannot pretend to throw the least light on such abstruse problems. The mystery of the beginning of all things is insoluble to us; and I for one must be content to remain an Agnostic. ~ Charles Darwin
2006-10-25 04:44:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by AuroraDawn 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The problem is that science has EXTREME limitations. Just because something is "science" doesn't make it true.
The key issue in the origins debate is: What is science?
Unfortunately, western culture has adopted this nonsensical notion that science is truth, and that any belief not originating inside scientific methodology is without any merit. This line of reasoning is false and completely hypocritical.
All human belief is based on faith, and all human belief operates within predefined philosophical parameters (yes, including "science").
-Aztec276
2006-10-25 04:49:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Religion, Church of England, though Unitarian family background, Agnostic after 1851.
2006-10-25 04:44:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kathryn™ 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually there's quite a nice section on Darwin in this week's New Yorker magazine, if you really are serious I suggest you read it.
2006-10-25 04:43:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by fourmorebeers 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I thought he was an atheist until his death bed ditch effort at afterlife insurance.
But, that is my take on those who seem logical but still keep a cross around their neck. Just afterlife insurance to make them feel better about the inevitable.
2006-10-25 05:28:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
He was a Christian for most of his life and then he had a falling out but near death he became a Christian again. at least that's my understanding of it.
2006-10-25 04:43:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by Amanda C 2
·
0⤊
2⤋