English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i'll tell you what will happen:
cows will run amok and eat all the greens, their rotting and sick corpses will infest our soil.
chickens will eat most bugs, hindering plant germination
fish will eat all the reef, causing the army to blow up more ships to create risky artificial reefs
basically, the whole ecosystem will go out of whack.
what else are animals here for? what purpose do chickens serve? and pigs, for that matter.
now, i'm not some crazy redneck deer hunter, but shouldn't we do something to control their numbers? why mess with something that has worked for so long? the cavemen ate animals and that is how we were able to descend from them and live here today.

2006-10-07 10:53:53 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Food & Drink Vegetarian & Vegan

that's my point charles, what if we don't eat those mass produced animals? what if we just stop eating chicken nuggets and burgers? i'm talking about ALL animals, even those poor little chained up baby cows. what are we gonna do, let them run free?
heck no! the ecosystem wouldn't be able to handle it. that's my point. maybe i should have been more specific, but my point ultimately is that we need to keep the balance.

2006-10-07 11:04:35 · update #1

26 answers

Before us, before humans animals ran free. It's because of flesh eaters that we reproduced and reproduced for animal consumption...it's our fault that there are so many animals not the animals. You let them roam free as they once did and you let the other flesh eating animals take care of that situation and on and on and on as it is in the wild and as it should be now....we weren't ever meant to eat meat. It is aquired not required, it doesn't even digest in our stomach's it rots...

You need to get more educated before you come onto our site and open your ignorant mouth about an issue you know nothing about. Now charles has done his homework....I'm no longer the part of the mess that was made through mass production so I'm not worried about how it all turns out. I'm NOT EVER going to put another filthy, steroid, antibiotic infested piece of meat into my system again. Eat on....

http://www.all-creatures.org/articles/ar-aninsidelook.html

2006-10-07 11:57:37 · answer #1 · answered by Lipstick 6 · 3 2

i dont agree with you this is what i think

the world isnt suddenly going to stop being veggie overnight soo.
stop artifically making them have so many babies and becuase the're not having babies and they are still getting murdederd the amount of animals goes down yeah?

and when there's no animals left people will have to be vegan
(i dont mean no animals left) i mean no animals left in factory farms) and then the poor countries where the animals get looked after can grow vegatbles (making the soil better) and stopping them all starving (if they are) the worlds population cant all be fd on a meat eating diet but they can on a vegan or veggie diet
and fish are dieing out anyway and where i live most fish live in the north sea not much reef there

"why mess with something that has worked for so long"
sorry to have to break it to you we havent locked animals in tiny cages and fed them chemicals scince the stoneage

what else are animals here for? what purpose do chickens serve? and pigs, for that matter
what perpose arepeople for

"JESUS ATE MEAAATTT!!!!"
jesus lived 2 thousand years ago they didnt have a choice then we do now and he was a bit busy inventing? (if you know a better word use it) christianity

2006-10-08 08:14:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I see no data against it. subsequently I haven't any reason to not have self belief it. Edit: could not have been an area flood, for 2 motives. First, if it became purely an area flood, it may be extra effective for Noah to bypass extremely than build a huge boat, fill it with animals, and stay in there for a year. 2d, God promised He could in no way wreck the earth with a flood lower back. If the flood of the Bible became in simple terms community, then God is a liar. Are you calling God a liar? Oh, and Noah's 3 sons additionally survived. and that they had a great number of youngsters. And their childrens had childrens. Noah is the ancestor of just about 12 billion human beings, all divided up into cultures who inherited their ancestors' flood thoughts. Noah's call isn't a similar from u . s . a . to u . s . a . (the Hawaiians call him Nu'u), yet his tale is, for the main section. there became an ocean in the previous the flood, in spite of if it became smaller than the collective oceans of at present. most of the water now interior the oceans became initially underground. It got here to the floor interior the form of mist two times an afternoon, in simple terms like the tides.

2016-11-26 23:31:15 · answer #3 · answered by brigance 4 · 0 0

If we were breeding the animals in the huge quantity that we do at the moment there would only be a small amount of each species. Therefore we wouldn't be overun with animals.
If you asking why animals are here perhaps you should ask why people are here and why plants are here? We simply don't know, but what we do know is that we able to suvive without eating them, so why not let them live a happy, carefree life just like we want to.

2006-10-08 23:18:07 · answer #4 · answered by meday 2 · 0 0

First off after we all started not eating meat then there would be some who stop eating plants as even plants do have a primitive nervous system and can feel pain.
however I am in full support to improve the horrid conditions as many animals endure as long gone, are the days of happy free ranged animals at a small local farm

2006-10-07 12:54:40 · answer #5 · answered by Magnusfl 3 · 0 0

If you are strongly for the consumption of meat products then why are you posting questions in the vegetarian/vegan catagory?

The reason why there are so many cows is because they are mass produced to eat. If humans had left animals alone to there own devises there wouldnt be any overpopulation of any specific species.

2006-10-07 13:02:47 · answer #6 · answered by Frank 3 · 4 1

pst... just to tell you i'm no vegitatian but any way since you asked

Have you ever heard of the mass production of animals?
Fish farms, Cow farms, chicken farms?

All that is man made, they put delicious sticky chemicals in the cows, chickens, and fish... yum!! so they can GROW faster for your needs. At the rate we eat our food there is no way the enviroment could keep up. THAT'S why we have endangered species, and governmebts put fishing bans in some places

Any way that's my argument, what's your reuttal?

2006-10-07 11:00:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Um, This is stupid, and if you can't figure out why... well... But thank you, Andy B and I finally found something to agree on.

Thanks for 2 points.

P.S. plants can't feel pain. If you really think so, than show us were you got that information.

2006-10-07 17:02:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I agree with what vegan/pro says. Educate your self first before you get on here and say something out of line that doesnt make any sense. Sorry to say but first impressions are what people remember the most!

2006-10-07 14:07:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

You're naive. If we were to stop eating meat we wouldn't release the animals and let them run wild, for the reasons you stated it would be impossible. No one would want to keep them and they'd all be slaughtered. Farmed species would be practically wiped out overnight.

Deer would still be killed, but their meat would go to waste afterwards. In the absence of any natural predators they need to be culled.

2006-10-07 12:01:25 · answer #10 · answered by AndyB 5 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers