English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It is time to reconsider the confusing and ambiguious definition of the words:Father & Son; son of God, Son of David,son of adam, Children of God etc. etc.

Can't we agree 'one God'- the God of Adam, Ibraham, Ishmael and Issac and follow 'His Will' instead of creating confusions and following our own wills.

2006-09-28 22:31:28 · 14 answers · asked by aslam09221 6 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

14 answers

The True Messiah must be the Saviour for all humanity, and not only for the Jews.
How can men accept such a narrow-minded saviour on earth now as a saviour for the Jews, a saviour for the Christians, a saviour for the Muslims...and no saviour for all other people? How the world would look like if 9 saviours came separately for 9 world religions as have promised in the Holy Books?
The World Saviour had come, He is not the Saviour of any small groups. He Himself proved that He is the all-powerful Saviour, Educator, Subduer of all mankind. Please seek for Him before it is too late as it was for many souls in previous ages.
If I mention His Name here, many people may reject immediately for doubting my sincerity and my knowledge; so I just call each of you to seek independently for yourself. I beleive that He will surely guide your sincere steps as He did with millions of other souls.

2006-09-28 23:00:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

simply, too many christians are already far too buried under their various illusions and misleadings from the teachings they are given by other people.

>>"SOME Jews are going to accept the upcoming antichrist as a savior. SOME will not (144,000)"<<

actually its the other way around... more christians are likely to confuse the real messiah, which is what they should be calling the second coming. as their antichrist.

and have you considered the possibilitys your seeing alot of the roles in the revelations prophesys BACKWARDS? that is, not that the best of the belivers being raptured or whatnot, but the ones who are LEAST ready for the end times, and the farthest from the truth.

ect ect... if you look at it with this possibility in mind... well, it makes some things look totally different, and make much more sense.

2006-09-29 05:56:41 · answer #2 · answered by RW 6 · 0 0

If you can't see the end of days all around you then you need help. The New Covenant of Christ tells the future step by step. While others only take stabs at the past to explain themselves. There is a New World Order arising now as CHRIST predicted it would. The last war would be over Israel as predicted.

SOME Jews are going to accept the upcoming antichrist as a savior. SOME will not (144,000)

2006-09-29 05:42:08 · answer #3 · answered by digdugs 3 · 0 1

You will find that many of the different terms used in the bible (as opposed to those created afterwards) show different facets of big concepts.

Eg. the MANY names for God in the Old Testament...
Adoni, El-Shaddai, Elohim, Jehova-nissi etc all show different parts of God's nature and remind us that God isn't just about giving resources, or about being über powerful, but that he is all that and more.

I do believe that looking at the nature of God and following the example of Jesus will bring us further on in our walk.

2006-09-29 05:42:20 · answer #4 · answered by Tish-a-licious 3 · 1 0

hi, the jews failed miserably at their God given gifts. The testaments of God, written down, told and foretold exactly what they would do and not do. And to no surprise they still deny their messiah, was not Jesus Christ. For one reason and one reason only, they the jews refuse to share this Messiah with anyone but themselves. God had better plans for His Son, don’t you think?

2006-09-29 06:37:30 · answer #5 · answered by thomas 2 · 0 0

My Brother married a Jewish girl that said she was not a religious person, as soon as his son was born, the Jewish party started, now I don't care about any of this but I had to make a comment at the "Brith" (not sure of spelling), I turned to my sister in law and very loudly said "I thought you weren't religious, oh wait, he just might be the next "MESSIAH"", I got lots of heavy looks from the relatives, I just laughed my *** off !

2006-09-29 05:36:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

You generally assume that all religions are based off of Abraham's one god theory.

There are many religions not based on abraham's ideas. But christians have killed off many of the people that followed the other religions.

2006-09-29 05:55:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The Jewish Messiah came a long time ago. Isiah for told of His coming...

Isa 53:1 Who has believed our message? And to whom has the arm of the LORD been revealed?
Isa 53:2 For He grew up before Him like a tender shoot, And like a root out of parched ground; He has no stately form or majesty That we should look upon Him, Nor appearance that we should be attracted to Him.
Isa 53:3 He was despised and forsaken of men, A man of sorrows and acquainted with grief; And like one from whom men hide their face He was despised, and we did not esteem Him.
Isa 53:4 Surely our griefs He Himself bore, And our sorrows He carried; Yet we ourselves esteemed Him stricken, Smitten of God, and afflicted.
Isa 53:5 But He was pierced through for our transgressions, He was crushed for our iniquities; The chastening for our well-being fell upon Him, And by His scourging we are healed.
Isa 53:6 All of us like sheep have gone astray, Each of us has turned to his own way; But the LORD has caused the iniquity of us all To fall on Him.
Isa 53:7 He was oppressed and He was afflicted, Yet He did not open His mouth; Like a lamb that is led to slaughter, And like a sheep that is silent before its shearers, So He did not open His mouth.
Isa 53:8 By oppression and judgment He was taken away; And as for His generation, who considered That He was cut off out of the land of the living For the transgression of my people, to whom the stroke was due?
Isa 53:9 His grave was assigned with wicked men, Yet He was with a rich man in His death, Because He had done no violence, Nor was there any deceit in His mouth.
Isa 53:10 But the LORD was pleased To crush Him, putting Him to grief; If He would render Himself as a guilt offering, He will see His offspring, He will prolong His days, And the good pleasure of the LORD will prosper in His hand.
Isa 53:11 As a result of the anguish of His soul, He will see it and be satisfied; By His knowledge the Righteous One, My Servant, will justify the many, As He will bear their iniquities.
Isa 53:12 Therefore, I will allot Him a portion with the great, And He will divide the booty with the strong; Because He poured out Himself to death, And was numbered with the transgressors; Yet He Himself bore the sin of many, And interceded for the transgressors.

Only One fits this prophecy, Jesus Christ...

2006-09-29 12:23:51 · answer #8 · answered by Bob 5 · 0 0

There's only one God... the God of Adam, Abraham, Jesus, you, me, etc.

2006-09-29 05:55:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The "Trinity":
Now let us study the "Trinity" and its roots in ancient pagan worship. The "Trinity" of Christendom, as defined in the creed of Nicea, is a merging of three distinct entities into one single entity, while remaining three distinct entities. We are told to speak of the three gods as one god, and never as three gods which would be considered heresy (Isaiah 43:10). They are considered to be co-eternal, co-substantial, and co-equal. However, only the first was self existent. The others preceded from the first. This Neo-Platonic philosophical doctrine has its roots not in the inspiration of God, but in ancient paganism. Most ancient religions were built upon some sort of threefold distinction. Deities were always trinities of some kind or consisted of successive emanation in threes.
In India we find the doctrine of the divine trinity called "Tri-murti" (Three-forms) consisting of Brahma, Vishnu, and Siva. It is an inseparable unity though three in form. Worshipers are told to worship them as one deity. Such concepts posed no problem to the logic of a Hindu worshipper since they were already used to worshipping gods with the body of a man and the head of an elephant(Ganesh), or monkey-faced gods (Hanuman), or gods with six arms, and so forth. Remember, classical Hinduism dates back to at least 500BC, with roots extending as far back as 2000BC.
The Brahmas also have their trinity. In their trinity, Vajrapani, Manjusri, and Avalokitesvara form a divine union of three gods into one god called "Buddha." The citizens of China and Japan also worship Buddha, but they know him as "Fo." When they worship him they say "Fo, is one god but has three forms."
Sir William Jones says:
"Very respectable natives have assured me, that one or two missionaries have been absurd enough to in their zeal for the conversion of the Gentiles, to urge that the Hindoos were even now almost Christians; because their Brahma, Vishnu, and Mahesa (Siva), were no other than the Christian Trinity."
Bible myths and their parallels in other religions, p. 370.
The ancient Egyptians also worshipped a trinity. Their symbol of a wing, a globe, and a serpent is supposed to have stood for the different attributes of their god.
The Greeks also had their trinities. When making their sacrifices to their gods, they would sprinkle holy water on the altar three times, they would then sprinkle the people three times also. Frankincense was then taken with three fingers and strewed upon the alter three times. All of this was done because the oracle had proclaimed that all sacred things ought to be in threes. Remember that the philosophy of these people (The Greeks) is what was primarily responsible for defining the Christian "Trinitarian" nature of God. This was done through the writings of the Greek philosopher Plato regarding his "Logos" ("word"). Further, remember that the Gospels of the Bible were named the "Greek Gospels" for a reason: they were written in their language and based upon their philosophy.
As mentioned previously, T. W. Doane says:
"The works of Plato were extensively studied by the Church Fathers, one of whom joyfully recognizes in the great teacher, the schoolmaster who, in the fullness of time, was destined to educate the heathen for Christ, as Moses did the Jews. The celebrated passage : "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word Was God" is a fragment of some Pagan treatise on the Platonic philosophy, evidently written by Irenaeus. It is quoted by Amelius, a Pagan philosopher as strictly applicable to the Logos, or Mercury, the Word, apparently as an honorable testimony borne to the Pagan deity by a barbarian........We see then that the title "Word" or "Logos," being applied to Jesus, is another piece of Pagan amalgamation with Christianity. It did not receive its authorized Christian form until the middle of the second century after Christ. The ancient pagan Romans worshipped a Trinity. An oracle is said to have declared that there was 'First God, then the Word, and with them the Spirit'. Here we see the distinctly enumerated, God, the Logos, and the Holy Spirit or Holy Ghost, in ancient Rome, where the most celebrated temple of this capital - that of Jupiter Capitolinus - was dedicated to three deities, which three deities were honored with joint worship."
Bible Myths and their parallels in other religions, pp. 375-376.
Trinities were not confined to these groups alone, but the Persians, the Assyrians, the Phoenicians, the Scandinavians, the Druids, the inhabitants of Siberia, the ancient Mexicans, the Peruvians, and many others, all worshipped "Trinitarian" pagan deities (among a great multitude of other gods) long before the council of Nicea of 325 C.E. officially recognized this to be God's "true" nature.

2006-09-29 05:47:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers