“I’m certain that if my husband and his national security team had been shown a classified report entitled ‘Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States,’ he would have taken it more seriously than history suggests it was taken by our current president and his national security team,” she told reporters.
But he was Hillary! PDB 12/4/1998, Subject: Bin Ladin Preparing to Hijack US Aircraft and Other Attacks. In fact Clintons PDB was worse it had Sam missles being used also and was just 4 months after the Embassy bombings in Africa.. Other than that the reports are the same with vague information and that we (the FBI and CIA) are working on it.
One can compare the two PDBs in the 9/11 Commission report on pages128/129 and 261/262. If you don`t have the book you can see them at: http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/whitehouse/pdb_6aug01.htm
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1177973/posts
Hillary knows your not going to actually read them.
What do you think?
2006-09-28
12:36:10
·
24 answers
·
asked by
Gone Rogue
7
in
Politics & Government
➔ Civic Participation
Teacher, its from the 911 Commission Report and has nothing to do with the press.
2006-09-29
07:28:53 ·
update #1
jl_jack09 Again this is not from FOX its from the 911 Commision Report. You shouln`t be afraid to read it. Bush missed but he wasn`t afraid to pull the trigger. Our Generals dropped tons and tons of munitions on Tora Borra along with sending the Special Forces and a couple thousand afghani`s to get Bin Laden. Clinton wanted to arrest him but was afraid to do it.
2006-09-29
07:37:16 ·
update #2
Kim Y, yes there was a plan identical to the Alantic bombing that was stopped a couple of months ago. It was to Hijack 12 planes and blow them up over the Pacific. This would have shut down air traffic around the world as we wouldn`t know how it happened with the evidence and 3000 people gone.
2006-09-30
05:47:45 ·
update #3
HI Steven, I know of some intelligence that we received via Phillipino Muslems that were interviewed. I am not certain of the date, but it may go back to the late 1980's. In anycase, they were telling of wanting to run planes into buildings. Sorry, it was just something I heard on the radio (KRLD 1080am, Dallas), so I can't really point out a source.
I will check your links out later. Have to run errands now. Thx!
2006-09-28 12:38:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by YRofTexas 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Rice told Congress, Bush did not think the PDB report was anything other than a "historical" report. Read that part, it's in the Sept. 11th. commission report by Congress. A "historical" document. Give me a break. Hillary and Bill were both dead on right. Bush Ignored the report, just like he ignored the list of ten things to be done about Bin laden given to him by Clinton 8 months before 9/11. that report is in Richard Clarks book "against all enemies".
You should read some and become more informed on the facts.
FOX news is not a good source for facts and Rush is a proven liar on this issue as well. You also fail to mention that it was Bush who would not send more troops into Tora Bora when our troops were very close and it was Bush who disbanded the CIA unit to get Bin Laden.
2006-09-28 12:56:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by jl_jack09 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
This is the first I've heard about the 1998 report. I have read the PDB given to President Bush. No rational interpretation of that document can be said to predict anything like the 9/11 attacks. Even if it did, there was not enough information to take any action short of grounding all commercial air traffic to prevent the attacks. Unfortunately rational discussion has never been accepted on this issue.
2006-09-28 13:31:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by STEVEN F 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hillary is so busy trying to walk the center line between her left wing backers while she is trying to woo the more conservatives, you have no idea what she's going to say. And, we have even less of an idea what's she's going to do. And there lies her real threat. It's like the old shell game. You put a pea or penny under a half walnut shell - one of three - and shuffle the shells. Then someone tries to guess which shell is hiding the penny. Hillary is busy darting around under the shells - trying to confuse the conservatives into voting for her. But, truth of the matter is, once she gets what she wants, she'll be right back to her liberal buds, like Ted Kennedy and John Kerry - pushing her own agenda.
Let's hope the public isn't fulled either by her statement above, or the rest of her hocus pocus.
2006-09-28 12:47:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by kids and cats 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
there is not any would desire to have faith anybody in the Bush administration planned the 9/11 assaults, in spite of the undeniable fact that it quite is definitely available that the Al Qaeda plot got here to the attention of the CIA, and so on. earlier it got here approximately. Having become confident that a important terrorist strike performed via middle-eastern men might clinch the deal for an invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, which has mandatory oil and organic gasoline reserves, all that became quite had to do became to easily permit the attack take place. No, it would not be had to have hundreds of human beings in the loop in this conspiracy. purely some might do it. 9/11 is the everyday version of Pearl Harbor. Roosevelt knew Pearl Harbor became going to take place and he did not end it because of the fact he needed a bad attack as an excuse to get the U.S. in contact in WW II. comparable think of with 9/11. Bush and Co. had to invade Iraq even earlier they got here into place of work. they only needed the excuse. Osama (former CIA asset) to the rescue. inspect the hyperlink under. it quite is a timeline of activities surrounding 9/11 from the 70's to the contemporary. each and every get right of entry to has references from the mainstream media.
2016-10-18 04:01:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Erika 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Former President Bill Clinton was the sorriest piece of government in the White House. Not only did he lie in court he disgraced the office of the People. We The People Of The United States. Never Forget That! It's called PERJURY. And get this, we still pay him every week out of our paychecks! And we will until he dies. (Look up Presidential Pay and Benefits)
He should be in JAIL.
2006-09-28 14:10:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Tosky 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
So you say. Do you really think all of that report was given to the press? Do you think anything negative about Bush and his puppeteers was hidden? Hillary is much smarter than you think, and, no, I don't want her to be president, but you should not underestimate her power in the Senate. Bush made a huge mistake with Iraq, not Clinton. Bush made a huge mistake on Bin Laden, Clinton blinked and missed his chance. Big difference.
2006-09-28 12:48:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Teacher 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
America, as a whole, wore blinders that anything of the 9/11 magnitude could happen on our own soil. Clinton did not see it coming anymore or less than Bush did.
2006-09-28 12:46:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Lady in Pink 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Lying and breathing are the same thing to the post-First Lady who bought a seat in Congress. I honestly don't believe she has the slightest idea of the difference between the truth and a lie.
A friend of mine said, "She can teach the Devil how to tell lies."
So why are we even listening to anything she has to say?
2006-10-03 15:46:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mr.Been there 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hillary didn't even know her hubby was giving clarinet lessons to Monica. How the heck did she know what was going on in the Oval Office when she didn't know what was going on in the hallway just outside. She ain't the sharpest tool in the shed.
2006-09-28 12:49:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋