English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-28 09:38:40 · 10 answers · asked by waqar a 1 in Food & Drink Other - Food & Drink

10 answers

In the past consumables were often adulterated,so as to make more profit for the seller. Some of these adulterations were dangerous and caused deaths Legislation was gradually brought in to prevent this Believe me we need food legislation even though some of it at times seems petty

2006-09-28 09:49:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

As members of the European Community we have no option. Brussels tells us what to do. But I, for one, am glad that we are being protected from food contamination, dirty kitchens, unhygienic cooks, mouse and rat droppings, food which is past its sell-by date and all kinds of other horrors. The introduction of good legislation meant higher standards all round. In practice it can lead to what might look like unfairness, as it is very difficult for people to prepare food for sale to the public in their own home, as a cottage industry, even while they maintain high standards of cleanliness, as the food hygiene regulations are so very demanding. There have been cases of people who had prepared food at home for sale at charitable events being prosecuted because they were not able to provide all the hand washing and nail brushing facilities at the place of sale which the legislation required. The trouble is, when such legislation has been introduced for the protection of the public it has to apply to everybody. And, I repeat, I am glad that it exists.

2006-09-28 10:31:02 · answer #2 · answered by Doethineb 7 · 1 0

If you didn't have food legislation then manufacturers could add anything to there products and also they would have to declare it on the ingredients.

The food leg is also there to protect the manufacturer from the consumer. As they would able to sue for anything.

Its not the only legislation food manufactueres have to use or comply too. I know cause I work in a food manufacturing company.

2006-09-28 10:01:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Look for a country that does not depend on agriculture for food and that will be your answer. Cattle, corn, bananas, tomatoes, eggplants, chicken, swine, potatoes and practically anything you consider as food has one way or another undergone genetic modification to suit human consumption.

2016-03-26 21:43:48 · answer #4 · answered by Lisa 4 · 0 0

As in Does the government have the right to ban certain foods? or Does the government have the right to regulate how foods are made, etc?

No to the first, yes to the second.

2006-09-28 09:49:34 · answer #5 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 0 0

there have been recommendations regarding the control of the food industry that have been overlooked, specially the beef industry. With reagrd to your question, read this custom essay by Writengine on RECOMMENDED CONTROLS IN THE BEEF INDUSTRY

2014-03-28 01:46:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

to make sure that every company or institutions who's manipulating the product will respect the humans tolerances determined and regulated FDA

2006-09-28 09:50:09 · answer #7 · answered by byron_td 1 · 1 0

If you've ever read Sinclair's "The Jungle", you'd understand about why we needed it for the meat-packing industry.

2006-09-28 09:48:34 · answer #8 · answered by chefgrille 7 · 1 0

to ensure quality

2006-10-02 03:47:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

to stop us from being poisoned!!!

2006-09-28 11:13:35 · answer #10 · answered by carol g 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers