English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This guy on ebay is selling a painting, painted by himself as #2 of 5. He says he's been trained in art in college. To me this makes no sense. Isn't each painting considered an original and one-of-a-kind painting? http://tinyurl.com/ehdx3

2006-09-28 09:04:17 · 10 answers · asked by DigsRetro 3 in Arts & Humanities Visual Arts Painting

Click the link for the example of what I'm asking about.

2006-09-28 09:10:17 · update #1

10 answers

Absolutely NO! An original is one of a kind. I have a collector of my work who insists I put " 1 of 1" on each piece he purchases. Silly, I know, but he feels that's more of a guarantee than the certificate of authenticity that accompanies each of my originals. To say it's #2 of 5 could mean it's a limited edition print, but only doing an edition of five is costly and seemingly pointless. I would concur with the individual who says it's the second in a series. If that is the case, it could very well be an original. However, I would ask for a certificate of authenticity before I agreed to purchase.

2006-09-28 09:38:25 · answer #1 · answered by Rembrandt11 3 · 1 0

In a word, No! many musicians wrote pieces which they were, perhaps, a little dissatisfied with at first and went on to write multiple scores based on and following the themes of, the original but each work can still be considered a variation of the original.
In the artist's case, each work will be unique in the sense of being the only one of it's kind, but by the use of different strokes of the brush, or even slightly different mixtures of colour, they can still be considered 'variations on an original theme. On the other hand, the original painting may have been created as a triptych which is a painting created in 3 panels, usually as part of a religious theme.

2006-09-28 09:17:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

At first I thought it must be a print -- 2 of 5, but when I read his ad is says it is #2 in a SERIES of 5 paintings. That is why it is still original, it is a one and only, but there must be 4 similar, or that have the same theme, colors, etc...

2006-09-28 09:07:49 · answer #3 · answered by Beth M 4 · 0 0

Maybe it's 2 in a 5 part series, but in any case, original can simply mean, "touched by the masters brush". There are many versions of the famous painting "Water lillies" and they are all the originals.

2006-09-28 09:06:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He means that it is #2 in a series of 5. Most painters do series of relevant or the same subject or item. Just like a photographer when they have a set of pictures. They number them in the order with wich looks good to them or how they were taken. If it was a print, it would be labled thus: 2/5. It is just the second one in a series of 5.

2006-09-28 09:05:48 · answer #5 · answered by gin 4 · 0 0

most of the time when an artist creates a painting, they will make different prints or copies of the same painting. thats so they can make more money on the single painting.

2006-09-28 09:07:52 · answer #6 · answered by yonitan 4 · 0 0

Your first assumption grow to be a hundred% perfect! production unit paint is lots greater stable than a repaint. pressing the fringe of a finger nail into production unit paint leaves no mark. attempt it on a fix or repaint. stable luck!

2016-10-01 11:31:36 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

maybe he create 5 (diffrent) self paintings and this one is the #2

2006-09-28 09:11:40 · answer #8 · answered by morroniac 2 · 0 0

It's either a lithograph or it's the second of five in a series.

2006-09-28 09:08:23 · answer #9 · answered by willow oak 5 · 0 0

That would probably be a print or a lithograph.

2006-09-28 09:05:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers