Evolutionists: Two fundamental equations?

Question

I posted this question yesterday, thought i would run it by you evolutionists again:

Here are the two premises on which various theories of evolution are based.
1 - The evolutionary formula for making a universe:
Nothing + nothing = two elements + time = 92 natural elements + time = all physical laws and a completely structured universe of galaxies, systems, stars, planets, and moons orbiting in perfect balance and order.
2 - The evolutionary formula for making life:
Dirt + water + time = living creatures.
Evolutionists theorize that the above two formulas can enable everything about us to make itself—with the exception of man-made things, such as automobiles or buildings. Complicated things, such as wooden boxes with nails in them, require thought, intelligence, and careful workmanship. But everything else about us in nature (such as hummingbirds and the human eye) is declared to be the result of accidental mishaps, random confusion, and time. You will not even need raw materials to begin with. They make themselves too.
Am I correct in stating the above? Is it logical? Are these theories truly scientific keeping in mind that for a scientific theory to be proven it must be observed, tested and possible to recreate? If evolutionists believe in such theories, isn’t evolution classified as a religion?
"Often a cold shudder has run through me, and I have asked myself whether I may have not devoted myself to a phantasy" (*Charles Darwin, Life and Letters, 1887, Vol. 2, p. 229).
“As by this theory, innumerable transitional forms must have existed. Why do we not find them embedded in the crust of the earth? Why is not all nature in confusion instead of being, as we see them, well-defined species?”—*Charles Darwin, quoted in H. Enoch, Evolution or Creation (1866), p. 139.

Answer 1

The first one is not evolution - it's cosmology.

The second one is not evolution - it's abiogenesis.

So, you haven't even touched what biological evolution actually states. Sounds like you need a beginner's introduction to the basic concepts.

Here's a great web page:

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/

Don't worry - just put a little effort into it. While an intuitive understanding of the time scales and population dynamics is difficult, the basic principles - which you don't even touch on in your post, I'm afraid - aren't too difficult.

Answer 2

You don't know anything about evolution.
Evolution does not make predictions on either the creation of the universe or the how the first life started.
Christianity says
God came from nothing and poof theres the universe
God + Mud = man...so you believe you are made from mud
God + Rib = woman.
Yeah that makes tons of sense.
To adress your question on stars and elements, the mechanism for star "birth" and "death" and the creation of heavier elements is well understood. The same theories are used to create nuclear wepons and run nuclear reactors. Fusion.
The statement about the universe being in perfect balance is not true. And even if it was, the only way that life could have evolved as we know it is in a universe with the physical laws ours has. If the laws had been different then doesn't it follow that if life evolved there it to would be different?
And finally the "theory" that you are an idiot will soon become a Law if your not careful...seek knowlege.

Answer 3

You are confusing evolution with Creation. The initial formation of the universe doesn't come under the heading of evolution at all. First of all, nothing biological existed in the newly formed universe, and evolution is a biological process. Secondly, evolution is not concerned with origins, but only with gradual change in existing things. Something can't evolve if it doesn't exist. Science can never deal with the origin of matter out of nothing, for it is not a natural process, and science is the study of the natural world and natural processes. But science can certainly look at the world as it is now, and the world as it was millions of years ago, and study the differences.

Answer 4

What part from yesterday did you not understand that your "theory" of evolution is mistaken and ignorant??? What part of evolution has anything to do with creationism????????? Yes, you asked this yesterday, and still your primitive view of evolution hasnt changed any. Why is that? Did you learn nothing from your responses yesterday? OBVIOUSLY not.....

Yes, there were no transitional fossils when Darwin wrote that in 1866. Its now 2006, 140 years later, and those transitional fossils have been found. Trying reading a newspaper....its all over the news.

Answer 5

Nowhere in origin of the species does it state that we evolved from nothing. There has always been matter and/or energy in some form or variety. The same question could be posed about God. Where did God come from? As far as an evolutionary formula for making life... If we had one, there would no longer be an argument would there. It's the search for our origins that seems to offend, I have no idea why, but using a God to explain them away is more offensive to me than the prospect of being the cousin of a monkey.

Answer 6

I answered this question yesterday. Aren't you supposed to avoid vain repetition?
Anyways, we don't know what things were like before the Big Bang, just as we don't know what things were like before the Beginning:
In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word WAS God.

And, the human eye still doesn't appear to have been intelligently designed. We went through that yesterday. My eye still has a blind spot today, and I didn't miraculously grow focusing muscles overnight so I could focus my eyes without the need for glasses.

Answer 7

You said: "accidental mishaps, random confusion"
This alone tells me you know nothing about evolution. Evolution is far from random. It is a gradual, cumulative process through which the simple can become complex and the complex become simple, depending on the selective pressures present. If you really want to know more, go read some Richard Dawkins. If not, get off this site and stop bothering us.

Answer 8

You have no clue as to what the Theory of Evolution is.

What you have ask is on the level of a 3rd grade understanding of science. Read a book on the subject and learn it before you try to disprove it.

The man who doesn't read good books has no advantage over the man who can't read them.
-Mark Twain

Answer 9

first of all you spelled fantasy wrong
second of all you don't add dirt, water and time and get life. its the chemicals that react to other chemicals and will eventually amino acids will form. the amino acids are the building blocks for DNA now we need some bacteria to form and you have living organisms and evolution takes care of it now

Answer 10

Why are you posting this question again? Are you thinking maybe it will be correct on Thursday since it was incorrect on Wednesday?