1. Most troops had body armor so 1 strike fo not knowing what you are talking about.
2. It's called humor, sadly as a leftist you do not know what that is.
3. How the hell is Bush responsible for the weather?
4. We all know you hate the President, we al lknow you hate the troops. We all know you get this same basic question reworded and posted more than one time a day. So can it already.
2006-09-28 05:42:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
4-Enron making money off of states' greed and stupidity was not a crime. The criminal actions of the Enron people happened under Clinton, too, and was part of that 'great' Clinton economy, eh?. But they were prosecuted under Bush.
5-Yes, that "evil" pro-life concept. How wrong it is to err on the side of life, eh?
6-The victory over Saddam's army and the overthrow of Saddam did occur quite quickly. You are apparently not observant enough to have noticed that, apparently. In the past 2 years, Iraqis have actually created a Constitution and voted in a government. The insurgents and the foreign terrorists don't like the concept of a free and democratic Iraq. They are fighting against it, with Democrats supporting their efforts.
7-Huh? You mean the fact that the intelligence that Clinton used to bomb Iraq magically became lies when Bush was sworn in? Care to explain that?
8-?? Compare to Hillary kissing Sufa Arafat, after Sufa ranted about Israel poisoning Palestinian children.
9-Well, we were. Even today, I think polls show a full 75% or more of Iraqis are still glad we came and removed Saddam. Or is this just another inconvenient truth?
10-Not every scenario pans out. Kind of like Clinton giving North Korea a nuclear plant to stop their nuclear ambitions. At least Wolfowitz' goof will only cost money. Clinton's may cost 10's of millions of lives.
2006-09-28 12:58:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
I can see how much you hate Bush and would do anything to get rid of him. Very well then.
I can't wait to hear what you say about the leaders when the Islamists clean your liberal clocks and establish Sharia Law over America. I'm sure you will have many hatefull things to say about them too. But they will just cut your liberal head from your self indulgent body and watch until your blasphemous lips quit spouting verbal bile. Then the consequenses of your choices will have come to roost.
2006-09-28 14:43:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by David AKA Dr Reason 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It goes back further than that.
How about Ronnie Raygun gutting HUD and education spending creating pervasive homelessness in the 1980's and a downward spiral of education while leaving a 5 trillion dollar debt behind.
Or Ronnie and George stealing 80 billion in weapons to sell to Iran (our enemy) to fund a secret war in Central America.
Or George the 1st telling women to "sit down and shut up" during the 1992 campaign.
Or making "Bill Clinton's head on a stick" their only mission during the 1990's...shutting down the government twice and trying to block any progress along the way.
Or trying to abolish Social Security.
Or running up a debt that dwarfs the Raygun debt while they have been in control of the government now.
Or...I could go on for a week.
2006-09-28 12:58:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Perry L 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
Well, since they DID find WMDs in Iraq, that kinda messes up your points 2 and 7, doesn't it?
Oh, wait, you're not going to start the "500 shells of sarin nerve agent don't count as WMDs, are you"?
2006-09-28 12:42:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ricky T 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
It is so so sad to know there are so many people in the world like you who don't have a clue what you are talking about. Do you hate all people or just our President, G. W. Bush and our American Soldiers. Which this is kinda ironic, our brave men and women in our glorious Armed Forces are fighting for your right to spout off how much you hate them! They fight so you don't have to.
God Bless America
God Bless Our Troops
2006-09-28 13:02:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
why do people bring up wmds under republicans? the intelligence agencies are the ones who told bush about them being there. if we hadn't gone in and later sadam bombed us, then you would be crying, "why didn't bush do something"
they moved the weapons. why is that so hard to understand.
get a life you stupid liberals. go bend over and let the iraquis, afganis and latins come and take over our country, then you'll be sorry.
2006-09-28 12:49:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by april_hwth 4
·
3⤊
2⤋
11) converting Clinton's $4,000,000,000,000 SURPLUS into Bush's $6,000,000,000,000 DEBT in five years flat!
Mission Accomplished!
2006-09-28 15:09:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by manabovetime 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
your speaking ignorance hero. But what the heck, you only want to hear what you believe right? So the truth is useless when told to you.
Basically, no matter what anyone says here, unless it is in compliance with your point of view, it is wrong. Enjoy living in oblivion...
2006-09-28 13:15:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Q-burt 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
So sad. A thousand points of light, and we had to get the dim one.
2006-09-28 12:42:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Mark 5
·
3⤊
1⤋