Christian fundamentalists insist that everything in the Universe demonstrates "intelligent design" by an all-powerful being called "God". But there are many oddities that an intelligent human designer would not have incorporated. So how do the Christian fundamentalists get round these objections?
2006-09-25 20:43:37 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
There is no reason for God to give men nipples. Or for dogs to have dew claws. Or for ostriches and emus to have wings. Or for whales to have small hind leg bones. Or for humans to have a tail bone. Or for fish that live in the dark and are blind to have eyes. Or for wisdom teeth in humans. Or the human appendix. All of these are vestigial. God would not have created these animals with parts that were a hinderance. Thus, creationism is dumb.
2006-09-25 21:17:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good question there!
Nipples on men are not an example of intelligent design are they! They serve no purpose and so if intelligent design existed, they would not be there.
The only reason males have nipples is because the nipples are formed before the sex of the child is determined.
2006-09-25 20:46:12 · answer #2 · answered by PollyPocket 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i will allow you to recognize what they are and also you could make your ideas up for your self. All fetuses are woman till about the 18th day after theory at the same time as the hydrogen attaches to the hormone generating testosterone. After testosterone is produced, the cells which may usually change into completely functioning ovaries start up to drop and change into testicles, forming sacks lower than the penis shaft to carry the testicles at the same time as they drop. the reason adult adult males have non-functioning nipples is that nipples start up to variety earlier the 18th day, yet once the testosterone is produced, the nipples will no longer be needed for breast feeding, and estrogen isn't any longer latest in sufficient parts to variety breast tissue and milk ducts, rendering the nipples ineffective.
2016-11-24 19:40:10 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You know I always wondered why men had nipples since women have them for the purpose of feeding thier children or at least that is what I always believed so it would bring up a good point as to why men actually have them too
2006-09-25 20:47:01 · answer #4 · answered by Tears30 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry folks, I'm not giving up my nipples for nobody! I love it when my daughter who is currently suckling sees me without a shirt and tries to get some milk... it's so funny!
plus, can you imagine a nipple-less chest on a man. that would look wrong. i think God has a wonderful sense of design... call it feng sheui if you wish, but i think they feel good when touched the right way.
2006-09-25 21:00:38 · answer #5 · answered by Mustafa 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That first person to answer was almost right...all embryos begin as female, they require a certain enzyme at a certain stage of development to become male. And by then, the nipples are already formed.
2006-09-25 20:48:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
After you grow up and get married, ask your spouse to suck your
manly nipples, then you will have your answer.
I Corinthians 13;8a, Love never fails!!!!!
9-25-6
EDIT: I am amazed at how many responders do not have the knowledge of the specific pleasure men receive from their wives
in this manner. Oh well, live and learn.
2006-09-25 20:47:31 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Is there a logical reason men haven't lost nipples in evolution? I wouldn't assume that because you don't understand the purpose of form that it is useless.
2006-09-25 20:48:15 · answer #8 · answered by W0LF 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hi there.
Here's a semi - serious answer -
God's creation is not only functional but it has visual appeal, too.
Men would look pretty stupid without nipples, right ?
God bless you.
2006-09-26 06:29:26 · answer #9 · answered by Carlito 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Men have nipples because they hate being left out of anything and they would just sulk if they didnt hav them
2006-09-25 20:58:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋