they have no evidence against him?

Question

since my friend has been conviceted of a murder and they have no evidence whatsoever what is gonna happen now?

Answer 1

Evidently they had something against him, if they convicted him of it. A conviction is when 12 jurors found sufficient evidence that the defendant was guilty of the crime presented by the District Attorney.

What is going to happen? Well, there will be a sentencing hearing, where his family and friends can plead for leniency, and the family and friends of the victim can ask for no mercy. From there, it is the express bus to the grey bar hotel.

Answer 2

My friend is having the same problem... he got life over an accident without any evidence or witnesses... All i know is he better get a good lawyer that will do an appeal and try to prove the DA wrong..

Answer 3

Depends, they can still try to prosecute him based on circumstantial evidence, albeit it is harder to convince the jury. Most likely, they'll let him go, but might keep a close eye on him afterwards. Do you really know if he actually committed a murder or just false? Cause you should testify against him, after all he did kill someone, if indeed. Plus its not just someone, but someone's mother and father, someone's brother or sister, etc.

Answer 4

If he's been convicted, then they did in fact present a case to a jury which deemed him guilty. So depending on the state in which the crime was committed, he could get the death penalty in some states or life in prision.

Answer 5

If somebody have been to declare, as an occasion, that Christianity ability that the sunlight revolves around the earth or that men and dinosaurs lived contemporaneously, i assume those are particular claims which may well be evaluated (and rejected) scientifically. (i might undertaking no count if the guy making such claims quite understood Jesus's message.) although, what I planned to be the mandatory suggestions of Christianity, as an occasion, that God exists, and that Jesus rose from the lifeless, are actually not scientific claims in any respect, and there is not any suitable scientific data to contemplate. No test or fossil can settle such questions definitively. those are, although, questions of actuality (the two they are real or fake), and there is data of a distinctive variety which may well be dropped at undergo. information and testimony, as an occasion, are many times regarded as data in trials; the place there is not any scientific data one way or the different, human beings in many situations choose questions by ability of weighing the credibility of information and testimony. contained with regards to Christianity, what do you're making of the Gospels? Do the money owed sound real? Did the authors stand to learn means or social status for his or her claims, or did they go through for them? additionally, we count extensive type very own journey or commentary as "data" in finding out daily whom to have faith, which street seems safer or quicker, no count if it's time to work out a physician, or no count if we could consistently take that new activity in yet another city or stay placed. there is data to contemplate in each and each of those situations, yet many of the time that is not scientific. contained with regards to Christianity (or extra generally, the life of God), what do you're making of your ability to journey issues, to be extensive wakeful? Does it seem as though something which would be created or superior from in easy terms actual issues or does it have a supernatural source? consistent with probability the physique finally got here from stardust, yet did the soul (as you journey it)? Assuming sufficiently futuristic technologies, how might one build a soul, and show fulfillment in that undertaking? the variety of knowledge won't lead all human beings to the comparable conclusions. although, i've got laid out my very own very own motives in some element on my blog, and in case you will possibly locate them useful, be at liberty to take a glance on the links under. Have a sturdy night, and peace be with you.

Answer 6

They don't need evidence. It's called accessory. Being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Answer 7

If he has been convicted, they had proof enough to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.

If he has just been accused, he needs a lawyer, not a posting on a web site.

Answer 8

If he was convicted by a grand jury then they have evidence.
A grand jury can not convict someone of a crime if there is not sufficient evidence.

Answer 9

How did he get convicted of murder with no evidence against him?

Did Bush testify?

Answer 10

they can't put him in jail with no evidence. all I can say get a good lawyer