What do you think that would happen to the southern part of Iraq?, what do you think would be the best course of action, for Bush if that happens?, send more US troops, that are already overstrained because of several deployments?, ask for the UN to send troops?
2006-09-25 14:19:54 · 3 answers · asked by freddy_conde 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Withdrawal of troops can be executed anytime as long as the new PM decides for what is good for the world.
2006-09-25 14:23:07 · answer #1 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dumbass Tony Blair is a liberal! I hope the next PM has the sense to get out of iraq. The bits will then redeploy to the afghanistan area to up hold there NATO obligations. Bush after he has a temper tantrum will have to either send more troops or leave my guess is he'll try sending the Iraqi army to hold the south !st he'll try to hold on until his term is over so the next president will pull our troops out. It's a pride thing with him. Rather childish and selfish if you ask me instead of doing whats right for the troops.
2006-09-26 13:37:55 · answer #2 · answered by brian L 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No sane country would be willing to send troops to bail Bush out.
Lambsto the slaughter. He caused the mess, he should fix it.
I, for one, supported Bush when he decided to attack Iraq, I STILL supported him when no WMD's were found, (toppling Saddam was necessary) but five years later all him and his band of idiots have achieved is create more 'crazies'? The UN will NEVER send troops, as Bush and his British fellow idiot acted on their own.
By the way, I am what some people here would describe as a 'liberal hippie tree hugger', and I supported Bush?!?!
(We know right from wrong, you know, but we also know when to say 'enough'!)
2006-09-25 21:31:42 · answer #3 · answered by Tokoloshimani 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋