i actually think that if North korea had nukes, leave them alone, if they don't, then smash them.
2006-09-25 12:39:52 · 12 answers · asked by xiy 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Are you volunteering to go?
Unless you can pull the troops out of your butt to support ANOTHER military presence of that scale, keep questions like that to yourself.
2006-09-25 13:06:38 · answer #1 · answered by desiderio 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the u.s has the right to attack anyone who puts an attack on them or as a goverment has plans on them the same as any country does.if the u.s does not find any evidence of that does not hold the right to attack anyone.besides the u.s cannot by any means afford a war with n.korea AND iran plus if that happened china and russia could easyily get involved.and do you honestly belive the united states could take all them on even with the united kingdom?plus when the new british priminister and even goverment is in power they aint gonna stand for that,and if anything like that triggers off (which it may wel do)theu.s aint gonna get very far without britain,and as daft as it seems britain happens the be the 4 most powerful country on the planet and if you want to count its commanwealth that would make 3 times more powerful then the u.s
2006-09-25 12:57:03 · answer #2 · answered by stoke 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That thought is too late the nuke genie is out of the bottle they already have the technology so bombing them only delays the inevitable they will have there nukes and we better get used to the idea of other countries having nukes because like anything else someone wants if they want it bad enough they will get it. Your only option is to make clear your response if they use it. so if they believe in your response they won't attack you and they end up with very expensive dust collectors.
2006-09-26 06:44:59 · answer #3 · answered by brian L 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the U.S. should use force on any country that has a crazy person in charge. Like Iran, North Korea, and Venezuela.
2006-09-25 12:44:20 · answer #4 · answered by sumrtanman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. That country or any country that is hostile to us doesn't deserve to have a military that can protect them from a band of monkeys. You know that rocket they fired but it failed? It was aimed for Hawaii. Of course, the media didn't spend much time on that.
2006-09-25 12:44:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh just mow everybody down! That way there will be no Iraq, no North Korea, hell, even no people! Imagine that. A blank, unpopulated dustball.
2006-09-25 12:47:01 · answer #6 · answered by mindrizzle 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Military force should be the absolute last response to any issue. Unfortunately, uninformed people think that it should be the first response, without considering consequences.
2006-09-25 12:48:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Flatten them both..Iran and N. Korea..Dont do an Army invasion..Just send some cruise missles, artillery shells, and a few 100 carpet bombers..Bombard the hell out of them w/ these..They cant attack us becuase of our Defense systems, and who would be stupid enough to do that after Pearl Harbor?
2006-09-25 12:42:45 · answer #8 · answered by I Hate Liberals 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Brilliant military analysis and if we try to smash them and they have nukes? Then what you genocidal maniac?
www.goarmy.com
2006-09-25 12:42:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Haven't we learned enough from Iraq. No military force is good.
2006-09-25 12:49:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋