to continue to burn coal and fossil fuels for energy or to use hemp for energy, which one would you choose?
would your church allow you to advocate such a thing? if so, would you?
2006-09-25 10:52:28 · 6 answers · asked by tandypants 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
i know it's not really a R/S type of question but i feel i'll get more responses here.
2006-09-25 10:53:23 · update #1
Hmmm...I think hemp may still put out emissions, and it still takes land to grow it, but you don't have to drill for it and there is not a limited supply, so I would have to go for the hemp, if it was ecologically better.
And I don't go to church so I don't have to worry about rules :)
2006-09-25 10:54:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'd use hemp, its growable and it won't run out eventually like fossil fuels will. And as for my church, i could care less what mine or any organized religion has to say on the matter.
P.S.- I'm Roman Catholic
2006-09-25 17:57:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure what you are asking. I will go for the cheapest and most economical fuel. (I mean more bang for the buck essentially. If it is practically free but burns like there is no tomorrow, I'd have to go with the other stuff)
And I don't understand the term "fossil fuels"
2006-09-25 17:58:44 · answer #3 · answered by helpme1 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hemp can't make enough energy, man.
Biodiesel from algae is the way to go. Read up on it.
2006-09-25 19:06:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would choose the hemp. And I don't have a church.
2006-09-25 17:55:32 · answer #5 · answered by Allison L 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i don't think it matters
2006-09-25 17:57:23 · answer #6 · answered by megamom 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋