Dr. Laura says that all women who "Shack up" with men are Whores?

Question

Do you agree?

Answer 1

Dr Laura is getting old.
There may be some validity in thinking that men should be willing to marry as a way of showing genuine appreciation of the responsibilities that go with sexual intercourse when you consider the number of women who end up with a pretty poor outcome when relationships fail but I believe it's way too harsh to think less of people who don't choose to sign up to the mindset of institutionalising their conduct.

Answer 2

No....and who made Dr. Laura a specialist on the subject anyway?...If she has never done it, then she doesn't know what she is talking about...and if she has done it..then she is calling herself a "whore"....
I try not to listen to people who judge other people. I don't believe they have the right unless they can walk on water or make miracles happen.

Answer 3

What does she mean by "shack up"? Living with someone unmarried? If so, then I don't believe that is the case. "Whore" is defined as a woman who engages in promiscuous sexual intercourse, usually for money. Promiscuous is defined as characterization by or involving indiscriminate mingling or association, esp. having sexual relations with a number of partners on a casual basis. So, if you don't sleep with men on a casual basis, and/or do it for money, then no, women who "shack up" with men are not considered whores.

Answer 4

Doctor Laura has been deemed a "Charlatan" years ago. Don't take any advise from that woman. She's hateful & ignorant. The answer to your question is no. Women who have sexual relations with those they love are not whores.

Answer 5

no, it is sinful to be calling names before you know what is going on inside those relationships. I use to shack up with men, but that doesn't mean there is something going on.. A whore normally lives alone because her nature is selling her body for money, so she likes her business personal because they know what they do is shameful and is animal wise, so they hide from the public....

Answer 6

Definitely not. Plus, I don't even like Dr. Laura. I find her annoying. She tries to be so truthful and cutting edge when in reality she is just an obnoxious woman who is consumed by her own misery.

Answer 7

Really, Dr. Laura they’re whores?

*surprised face*

I’ve always wanted a whore. Can I get one for Christmas?

*starts writing a letter to Santa Claus*

*then snickers while chanting the following verse*

A jocosely young lady named paaatches
Recruited whores by the batches
And when they took the vow
To sexual please men with her written do's of know-how
From there on she owned each and every one of their snatches

They’re mine, all mine! Except for that one *points* she’s got a green cooter and it scares me.

paaatches --Dr. Laura need to wash her cackling **** with soap and that whore, the one with the green cooter needs to spray her cooter with some whoreicide. I mean, antiseptic. *nods* Yes, she does. Wait, a slu-t-ty, slu-t, slu-t minute… is that whore the one with a green cooter Dr Laura? *does a double take then shrugs* Could be? *shakes a can of whoreicide which really is a can of Lysol in the air then chases Dr. Laura around the room screaming* I promise it won’t sting.

Answer 8

I think Dr. Laura is a whore

Answer 9

Absolutely not. She is twisted by the laws of Old Testament and will someday realize her heart has been locked in a cage and be crazy from all the bad advice she has given.

Marriage is a legal issue. The government should not be involved in my love relationships and biblical law has been done away with by God himself.

Answer 10

LOL she is so hilarious to hearken to..one in each of those slim minded experience of fact. on the subject of the living concern, i think of it is greater a rely of stupidity in some women's circumstances than a ethical judgement. The sexual norms have replaced immediately in 2008 because 1808 is the bottomline. Many means divorces have been prevented by using living collectively--because you get a fuller photograph of what you're moving into. in case you think of the guy is stringing you alongside, go away or kick him out. i could extremely be in that concern than be married to somebody who rather has some freaky-deaky themes i did no longer know approximately earlier. you apart from might can no longer blame adult adult males for desirous to be careful approximately linking their funds to a gold digger. i think of the entire submissive spouse concern merely makes women financially based on adult adult males. Which i've got self belief is rather absurd in the 12 months of 2008 and merely reduces marriage to a ability of monetary help. That equals gold diggers in my e book, no longer some thing somewhat in step with love. of course adult adult males could be financial purchasers too, even yet it form of feels to be greater regularly usual for women to do it. That hon is the *actual* reason many adult adult males are reluctant to commit, no longer the unpaid whore nonsense. He can merely bypass locate himself yet another "unpaid whore". Why is a woman who makes in charge sexual judgements as a consenting person noted as a "whore" besides? no longer something is incorrect with intercourse, it rather is a organic, humanchronic. I word the adult adult males never get noted as such names, even with their sexuality. i'm an ex therapist myself, and persons like Laura are merely out to make a popularity and money for themselves. could you, as a individual with a healthy vanity pay a cut back 200/hr to morally decide you? She is a large humorous tale to the entire container and that i think of maximum of her callers have already got considerable psychological themes to even seek for her valueless comments.