In South Carolina, a woman was sentenced to 12 years in prision for homicide by child abuse.
--homeless drug addict with IQ of 72
--was using cocaine at 8.5 months
--addicted to cocaine, and no drug-treatment options available to her
Please consider both sides before answering....what do you think? What are your reasons?
2006-09-25 08:02:46 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Parenting
Assume that yes, it was the cocaine that lead to the death of the fetus
2006-09-25 08:05:29 · update #1
I hate throwing in my opinion, because I don't want to bias the answers....but think about it
What about smokers? They can cause serious harm to their fetus as well. They have smaller babies, and risk premature birth. Should they be charged with child abuse?
2006-09-25 08:20:08 · update #2
I think she should be charged for NEGLIGENT homicide...that she killed someone due to her own neglect and stupidity.
The fact that someone who knows they are pregnant, and keeps on using illegal drugs is clearly trying to kill the baby.
There are many babies who live less than decent lives because their mothers smoked and drank while pregnant, but those things are perfectly legal.
Doing too many drugs, in my mind, is equal to a slow suicide, which is also illegal, so YES, I think she should be held liable for the obvious...that she was NEGLIGENT with the care for the life inside of her, and therefore was responsible for the stillbirth.
The punishment? I can't answer that. Many women make mistakes that lead to the deaths of their children. That is negligence....a mistake. Leaving the baby unattended in the bathtub, and they drown.....She is still liable for being negligent. Not taking the time to think.
This gal with the low IQ....I don't know how you punish someone like that, other than mandatory sterilization, but that would violate her human rights.
Too bad there are such troubled souls out there.
2006-09-25 08:14:13 · answer #1 · answered by gg 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I believe yes she should have. She could have at any point went to a police station and asked for help, or a church, well the list goes on and on to where she could have gone. There is no excuses what so ever, I grant u, the drugs make you do things you know you shouldn't do, but I don't see that for an excuse. Sure, look into why this baby died, but 99.99% of the time...its the drugs. You can't tell me that she started using at 8.5 months, so the damage to that baby would be numerous.
2006-09-25 08:12:48 · answer #2 · answered by spunkyshell2000 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
A very sad situation. But yes I think she got what she deserved and is actually better off now. If she had had the child and let it die because of neglect it would have amounted to the same thing. Even homeless people have treatment options, most shelters offer them. Now that she is in prison, she has decent clothes, shelter, regular meals, health care ( including drug treatment ) and probably learning a skill. She might actually turn her life around. Killing another human, even through neglect, should have consequences.
2006-09-25 08:09:43 · answer #3 · answered by roamin70 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
i'm surprised at how Christians and Atheists attack JW's for his or her ideals, the two attacking any nuance of their faith no rely what that's. on the tip of the day, all religions have strange ideals interior their doctrine. the only subjects all of us could incredibly care approximately with JW's are: a million. Blood - why? by way of fact people die needlessly over it 2. F&DS / Governing physique rule: why? by way of fact this will boost people to "god" status giving them a techniques too lots administration over the lives of individuals 3. shunning - especially glaring why 4. 1914 - why? thoroughly fake. Undermines the purpose of the scriptures by making use of bobbing up eisoteric formula that distract readers from the actual message of Christ each and every thing else.... who cares? All religions are loopy. Take out F&DS and you have seventh Day Adventists, take out 1914 and upload trip journeys you have baptists... etc etc. if JW's have been to offload the F&DS, the GB, 1914, Blood and shunning...... i'd be all in toddler :D
2016-10-01 08:42:39 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She was homeless and had an IQ of 72 because she was a dumb *** coke head. She had free condoms and drug treatment options available to her. She probably had a hell of a lot better and more readily available health care to her than to those who go out and work everyday, take care of their children and pay for their insurance. I have absolutely no sympathy for trash.
2006-09-25 08:27:11 · answer #5 · answered by Wiccan Woman 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, she should she would go to jail if she beat the baby why should she not be punished for putting her child in just as much danger or even more so because the child can not get away from her or tell someone.
2006-09-25 08:11:33 · answer #6 · answered by nica 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I believe she should be sentenced to twelve years in a mental institution. Drug rehab and lots of therapy. Maybe she didn't realize what she was doing, but that still isn't an excuse for doing the drugs that killed her baby. She should be punished.
2006-09-25 08:06:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
In certain situations when the person has done it before and is basically using it as a form of birth control, yes!
2006-09-25 08:06:46 · answer #8 · answered by Kristi's Mom 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
HELL YES THEY SHOULD!
AND SO SHOULD ANY WOMEN WHO HAS AN ABORTION BY CHOICE BECAUSE THEY ARE LAZY WHORES WHO KILL BABIES.
THE WOMEN KNEW SHE WAS PREGNANT AND SHE DIDNT STOP HER BAD HABITS, YES JAIL IS RIGHT FOR HER. IF THAT BABY HAD BEEN BORN AT 8.5 MONTHS, IT WOULD HAVE SURVIVED.
THAT IS MURDER, THAT LIL KID WILL NEVER HAVE THE LIFE IT WAS MEANT TO HAVE.
THAT BABY SHOULD HAVE BEEN AND WONT BE, BECAUSE THE "MOTHER" WAS A LAZY *****, YOU CAN QUIT DRUGS IF YU WANT TO.
ANY ONE WHO KILLS A CHILD IN UTERO IS A MURDERER, NO WAY AROUND IT.
2006-09-25 08:38:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2006-09-25 08:08:33 · answer #10 · answered by mom2dlea 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋