Why is there so much evidence for the evolution and none for god. If God created everything you would think he would have left behind some sign of himself, a cross on the moon or something. Why create the universe and leave no trace? Why ask people to worship using a burning bush?
Since all life on earth shares the same DNA. Does that mean that "GOD" just pieced things together out of parts laying around? Isn't the more logical explanation that we evolved?
2006-09-25 06:30:19 · 17 answers · asked by trouthunter 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Of course. Evolution is a fact.
A really really long yahoo name: Please think about what you just said. Nothing doesn't exist. If there was nothing. Then Your god doesn't exist because your god would be something not nothing. So your argument is not an argument for god. It is only an argument against nothing. Which is a strawman anyway. I believe nature has a reason for existing, I just don't believe it is your magical sky fairy. Instead I believe it is mathematics.
2006-09-25 06:33:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
First of all if God left a cross on the moon, evolutionists say it was proof that aliens evolved first and that early alienman made it. I think God figured that if creating the universe and all that is in it , isnt good enough for you, then he gives up. You say there is so much evidence for evolution. You are sadly just believing what the evolutionary scientists tell you, without actually studying for yourself. The bible clearly explains all of creation, and the worldwide flood (of which evolutionists now have to agree happened) and evolutions really explains nothing, except "this is how we can eliminate God". Genetics and dna research shows so absolutely clearly that we do NOT have the same dna, that I have to fault your ignorance. The more we know, the more the evolutionists CANNOT explain, instead of the other way around. You just don't hear all the creation scientific evidence because they don't LET you! If you want to believe that you share DNA with , and are no more valuable than, .... a rat , a potted plant, or bacteria, then I don't know what kind of science could prove otherwise to you. Evolution : Nobody x nothing=everything.
2006-09-25 06:42:45 · answer #2 · answered by Coco 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
God is God he does not have to leave proof that he exist, he did not have to do anyting to show you that he created all of this. the universe is infinite, our brain cannot even absorb that concept, And science does agree with that as well. Everything has an end, the universe does not have one, isn't that sufficient, why do you need a cross on the moon for. what about traveling billions of light years to get to some silly galaxy, and believing all this time that pluto was a planet, how many more thing we still have yet to be proven wrong. God is smart he want you to figure it out that is just how smart people operates. If I was God I would do the same.
2006-09-25 06:49:30 · answer #3 · answered by Halal Pig Ok in Islam 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He gave a lot of evidence. The Bible. And He even sent His Son here.
Creationists do not say that everything in evolution is false, we just believe that Creator is behind it all. We are happy tool the evidence.
God can create things aged. If you saw Adam the day after he was made,would you see a baby or a man? We are made from the same stuff as the animals, but only humans are created in "the image of God". We are able to choose between right and wrong. Or are we?
2006-09-25 06:38:46 · answer #4 · answered by SeeTheLight 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.
Romans 1:20
Creation in itself is proof of God's existence. The many complex and dependent systems at work on this planet and in this universe are not evidence of Evolution, but evidence of Intelligent Design.
2006-09-25 06:47:26 · answer #5 · answered by RazzleDazzle 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The whole, "something can't come from nothing" thing is stupid because then we can say, who created God if something can't come from nothing? Either something can come from nothing or it can't, whether or not you have an intelligent being. Personally I believe it makes a lot more sense for a lot of random particles and crap to accidentally come together and evolve into a primitive fish over millions of years than for a supreme entity to just pop up out of nowhere for no reason and THEN start creating everything else. I'm sure the rebuttal will be that, "well, God CAN come from nothing because he's just beyond our understanding." Um, that's why you invented the whole "god created everything" thing, because the idea of something coming from nothing is beyond your understanding and it's an easily digestible way to understand it... There's no scientific evidence that God can create himself, but there is evidence that the universe's time could recycle back on itself. No god required.
2006-09-25 06:41:00 · answer #6 · answered by d3p3ch3mod3 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
evolution is on the basis of perception the five senses. the proof of god is beyond those five senses but there hints nevertheless with those fields of perception. the answer to this is not necessarily a quick one. if you're serious about it you have to be willing to spend the time, with various readings of philosophy and as well as contemplation, meditation and association with the wise.
the second part of your question deals with the nature of empirical evidence. a rebuttle to what you asked is whether scientists have even accounted for more thatn 10% of phenomenal existence or more than 10% of the psychological mind. Relying solely on such investigations is still quite frustrating for anyone trying to answer the big 'life' questions. No need to rush take your time, be sincere and the answers will come automatically. That's how it works.take care bud.
2006-09-25 06:41:13 · answer #7 · answered by Tyrone 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you sincerely know what is evolution, you will know that the missing link is far more than any given doubt in creation.
If evolution is scientific, any school children will know that science can be proven by experiment. But we can not have half ape, half man sample, nor any new form of man that can fly (so we don't even need budget airline).
If you really study science, you will know that evolution go against the theory of Newton 2nd law of dynamic. (Those who believe in science, go check it out yourselves).
If it is true, Dawin will not have deny it before he died. He confessed that this is but a theory that he dreamed out. There is no basis.
I wonder since when, can a baseless theory can enter the science book of a stupid nation called " . . . ica " . Ok nevermind. Don't mentioned about that nation.
So, I studied science. I am a trained mechanic. However, I can never accept that stupid theory as science. They are purely nonsense. Too many question I have asked and find no answer.
It is thus much easier to accept that God created the world, and he loves us.
27 minutes ago
2006-09-25 06:35:52 · answer #8 · answered by Melvin C 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
There is NO evidence for evolution.
If there were, then it would be called the Law of Evolution, because once a scientific theory is proven, it becomes a law.
God asks us to believe by faith.
Oh, and there was that proof of His Son, Jesus, and all those witnesses who saw Him perform miracles, and saw Him come back after He died on the cross.
2006-09-25 06:40:16 · answer #9 · answered by Born Again Christian 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
trouthunt,,you said it all,just a little misunderstood.,God did create everything,evolution is the evidence left behind.Some call the moon itself the "guru" (teacher)planet.there is the shape of a heart on mars(see nasa Pictures).GOD has to use the burning bush and parables to communicate with people on their level.THE ONLY LOGICAL EXPLANATION OF THE EXPANDING UNIVERSE IS THAT GOD IS STILL "EVOLVING " IT TO EXPRESS HIS VISION OF HIMSELF. LOVE
2006-09-25 06:55:25 · answer #10 · answered by Weldon 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What makes you think God hasn't left traces?
Trace:
1) A barely perceivable indication.
2) An extremely small amount.
2006-09-25 06:38:00 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋